We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
IHT, Tenants in Common and Lifetime Interest
Options
Comments
-
Where the RNRB is not used on the first death it can pass to the second person for use on their qualifying property
in this case that is 1/2 the house so at least £250k, would need to check if the property in the IPDI trust also qualifies as it will be included for IHT.
If on the first death it can't be used, that makes it unused and transferable.
it is transferable even if the first to die had no assets or a house.
this in the IHT manual is relevant.
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/inheritance-tax-manual/ihtm46011
have a good read of the rest
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/inheritance-tax-manual/ihtm460000 -
The beneficiary has not received the half of the property following the death. It has transferred to a Trust which holds it until the wife has died. Therefore the housing benefit is lost.
Had it gone to the family member directly following death, by way of selling the property, then that is different. It needs to go to the spouse to retain the housing benefit.
Seek the advice of a STEP solicitor.
SamI'm a retired IFA who specialised for many years in Inheritance Tax, Wills and Trusts. I cannot offer advice now, but my comments here and on Legal Beagles as Sam101 are just meant to be helpful. Do ask questions from the Members who are here to help.0 -
It is not lost it is unused so becomes transferable.
What happens to the share of the house is not relevant.
It transfers even if there was no house.0 -
getmore4less wrote: »It is not lost it is unused so becomes transferable.
What happens to the share of the house is not relevant.
It transfers even if there was no house.
I believe Senior Sam is referring to the information in this link. Certainly looks relevant as OP said it went into a trust, NOT to a direct descendent.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inheritance-tax-main-residence-nil-rate-band-and-the-existing-nil-rate-band/inheritance-tax-main-residence-nil-rate-band-and-the-existing-nil-rate-bandSeen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it.0 -
SevenOfNine wrote: »I believe Senior Sam is referring to the information in this link. Certainly looks relevant as OP said it went into a trust, NOT to a direct descendent.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inheritance-tax-main-residence-nil-rate-band-and-the-existing-nil-rate-band/inheritance-tax-main-residence-nil-rate-band-and-the-existing-nil-rate-band
No where does that say it is lost, just unusable.0 -
getmore4less wrote: »No where does that say it is lost, just unusable.
........and nowhere does it say "what happens to the share of the house is not relevant" because it IS!Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it.0 -
It works the same as the regular nil rate band if you don't/can't use it it becomes transferable, not lost.
The HMRC manual says the life tenant can use the share in trust as part of their qualifying interest as it happens to be the same property they also own they can combine.
Once transferred it is the spouses qualifying interest that uses both RNRB.0 -
SevenOfNine wrote: »........and nowhere does it say "what happens to the share of the house is not relevant" because it IS!
Only to the extent of if the deceased can use their RNRB
If the property goes to spouse that is exempt so can't be use.
If it goes to a qualifying descendent it can be use
If it goes to trust in most cases it can't be used
if they can't use it then it becomes transferable you then look at the spouse can use it against their qualifying interests at the time.0 -
Thank you SevenofNine,
If you read the Government statements on this ..... https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inheritance-tax-main-residence-nil-rate-band-and-the-existing-nil-rate-band/inheritance-tax-main-residence-nil-rate-band-and-the-existing-nil-rate-band ........and the examples given, it show that what I have been saying is correct.
If the OP wants to save inheritance tax, the Will needs to be changed. No more comment on this is necessary.
SamI'm a retired IFA who specialised for many years in Inheritance Tax, Wills and Trusts. I cannot offer advice now, but my comments here and on Legal Beagles as Sam101 are just meant to be helpful. Do ask questions from the Members who are here to help.0 -
Thank you SevenofNine,
If you read the Government statements on this ..... https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/inheritance-tax-main-residence-nil-rate-band-and-the-existing-nil-rate-band/inheritance-tax-main-residence-nil-rate-band-and-the-existing-nil-rate-band ........and the examples given, it show that what I have been saying is correct.
If the OP wants to save inheritance tax, the Will needs to be changed. No more comment on this is necessary.
Sam0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards