We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Subsidence
ikceb
Posts: 11 Forumite
Hi
Has anyone ever purchased a house with as survey report stating slight subsidence?
Just to give a bit of context the property is a 1960 detached bungalow. the 'damage' is 2mm fractures to either side of the property.
The main causes of the subsidence appear to be
Minor episode of subsidence due to an ‘escape of water’ from the underground drains in the region of the waste water gulley.
Failure of the lintels, including corrosion and expansion of the imbedded steel reinforcement.
I have checked with my insurance and as long as I get a statement saying that the subsidence is long standing and non progressive they will have no problems insuring and at the moment there is no increase in premium.
The surveyor has advised a CCTV drain check with any damage found for the vendor to repair either with the water board or under their insurance.
They have also advised to replace the lintels and to have lintels fitted where they are missing
Am i wrong or in theory if i have this work done would that then make the 'subsidence' non progressive?
Also if I agreed to do with lintels would it be wrong of my to ask the vendor to have the cctv check carried out? Sorry bit of a newbie to this
Advice appreciated many thanks
Has anyone ever purchased a house with as survey report stating slight subsidence?
Just to give a bit of context the property is a 1960 detached bungalow. the 'damage' is 2mm fractures to either side of the property.
The main causes of the subsidence appear to be
Minor episode of subsidence due to an ‘escape of water’ from the underground drains in the region of the waste water gulley.
Failure of the lintels, including corrosion and expansion of the imbedded steel reinforcement.
I have checked with my insurance and as long as I get a statement saying that the subsidence is long standing and non progressive they will have no problems insuring and at the moment there is no increase in premium.
The surveyor has advised a CCTV drain check with any damage found for the vendor to repair either with the water board or under their insurance.
They have also advised to replace the lintels and to have lintels fitted where they are missing
Am i wrong or in theory if i have this work done would that then make the 'subsidence' non progressive?
Also if I agreed to do with lintels would it be wrong of my to ask the vendor to have the cctv check carried out? Sorry bit of a newbie to this
Advice appreciated many thanks
0
Comments
-
Sounds like you need a Structural Engineer's report stating "long standing and non progressive".0
-
You have to be careful with the dreaded S word when it comes to selling as many prospective buyers will be put off.
I'd bought a house that had had remidial work carried out by previous owners, but when it came time for me to sell I had to take a hit on price compared to a house that had never been affected in anyway by subsidence & of course it meant that many prospective buyers were put off once the S word was mentioned. So for me, I'd never want to buy any property that had had even a slight issue with subsidenceThe bigger the bargain, the better I feel.
I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.0 -
You should be getting a discount on this bungalow compared with similar ones. Even though the 'S' isn't severe and may well be rectifiable, (as above, get a structural engineer's report) there will be a similar penalty if and when you come to sell.
Cattie's experience bears this out, but presumably she didn't negotiate the price down sufficiently. Someone in my family bought in similar circumstances and she's pleased she did, because it made living in a desired neighbourhood a possibility rather than a dream.
Many houses have a down-side. You just have to get them at the correct price and be sure that you can live with whatever it is. Structural issues are often much easier to deal with than social ones!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards