We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Voluntary Termination - PCP

2»

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 178,377 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    AdrianC wrote: »
    Mileage simply isn't mentioned either way. So the question is one of whether covering substantially in excess of the contracted mileage is falls outside "taking reasonable care".
    At least one Financial Ombudsman's ruling in favour of the finance company stated they regarded exceeding the annual mileage of not taking reasonable care.

    Not paying the excess mileage charge is going to be one of those things you're going to have to decide to pay or be prepared to fight your case knowing there is no guarantee of a win, possibly in county court.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Nearlyold
    Nearlyold Posts: 2,399 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 6 April 2019 at 8:42PM
    Typical FOS responses here :- https://www.ombudsman-decisions.org.uk/viewPDF.aspx?FileID=37655

    https://www.ombudsman-decisions.org.uk/viewPDF.aspx?FileID=66776

    The Finance Companies write their agreements in such a way as to try and define that:-

    Excess mileage should be considered in relation to and as part of a fair wear and tear assessment and
    The Excess Mileage charge arises at the point at which the pro rata mileage allowance is exceeded (even though the customer is not asked to pay it at that point) thus because the charge arose before the termination of the agreement it becomes due at the point of termination as the law allows that charges that arise prior to the termination are still payable.

    FOS appear to side with both arguments in cases I have seen - though this does not mean that a Court would rule the same.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.