National Car Parks Ltd PCN to keeper

KeithP

Miras wrote: »

Hi there guys,
Have received a notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track.
What would be next step to take from here.
Cheers

Didn't point 8 in the list in post #2 above - the very first reply you received on your thread - offer the guidance you are now looking for?

beamerguy

13. In addition to the original parking charge, for which liability is denied, the Claimants legal representatives BW Legal, have artificially inflated the value of the Claim by adding costs of £60 which has not actually been incurred by the Claimant, hiking the Total amount of claim up to £xxx which are artificially invented figure in an attempt to circumvent the Small Claims costs rules using double recovery. The Defendant trusts that the presiding Judge will recognise this wholly unreasonable conduct as a gross abuse of process and may consider using the court's case management powers to strike the claim out of the court's own volition.

£60 ABUSE OF PROCESS BY BWLEGAL .... as per usual.

So as per usual you are directed to this link where DJ Taylor agreed with you. This case and it's case number should be added for the judge to see.

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

Then read Coupon-mad 's post at # 14