We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Selling my Leasehold Flat without Buildings Insurance in place

Hello All,

A quick Buildings Insurance question to kick off the weekend!

My Freeholder has recently been served a criminal conviction which has apparently invalidated the Buildings Insurance for our building in which I own the leasehold of one of three flats. I am in the process of trying to sell my flat and have just accepted an offer. Speaking to my solicitor I understand that a mortgage lender will absolutely and understandably not lend on a property without Buildings Cover.

Now my problem is that the Freeholder has absolutely no intention of taking out Buildings Cover in the foreseeable future. Despite threat of court action, etc, its so far down his list of priorities that I have to find a workaround to insure the flat/building is covered and that the sale can proceed.

- I have had conflicting advice from solicitors and the LAS regarding if it is possible and legal for me (or anyone other than the Freeholder) to take out Buildings Insurance in my own name. Does anyone have any insight into this?

- If I was able to take out Buildings Insurance in my own name what happens after the sale? Is this transferred to the buyer or invalidated?

- Has anyone got other suggestions or tips?

It's frustrating that the Freeholder dragging his feet could potentially ruin my sale. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks
Miles
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.