We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Building regs/load bearing wall

Hi all,

Looking for a little advice. We are buying a home in which the current owner has knocked through between two rooms, one of which was a load bearing wall. He's had it done properly, calculated loadings - actually over estimated as he was planning a first floor extension for which he had planning, steel bar installed, etc; - and has invoices. Work was done 7-8 years ago. BUT he didn't think he needed building regs and his builder didn't tell him. He has offered to pay for an indemnity. This came to light because it was one of the standard questions our solicitor asked.

During our mortgage application, the bank had a standard homebuyers valuation done - not a structural one. No issue was flagged.

We are trying to accelerate the exchange because one of the buyers in the chain needs to complete before an organisational restructure takes place.

This morning, the chap we are buying from contacted his solicitor to offer to pay for an indemnity to avoid the problem above. However, his solicitor said that might not be enough, and (our) lender might want building regs in place because of the risk of devaluation if there is a problem. Of course, to get building regs we are probably talking 6-8 weeks.

My biggest concern is really that the bank pulls the funding between exchange and completion. My sense is that the work has been done properly, particularly since the seller is very happy to pay for building regs.

So the question is: does an indemnity, which really only addresses enforcement risk, give the bank what it needs?

Will a structural survey suffice ()recognising that this might involve hacking stuff off walls?)

Can we get a private building control company to look at it?

Or do we need to wait for a proper council fellow with a clipboard, who probably won't be able to issue a completion certificate anyway, since its all hidden under plaster?

Advice gratefully received.

James.

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 178,430 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Building Regs need to be signed off by the council and they can ask for the plaster to be removed in order to inspect the work if they are of a mind to. They would probably also want a copy of the certificate for the RSJ
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Thanks. Since BR will take 6-8 weeks I am wondering if a structural survey will satisfy the lender (and myself)?
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If the lender's survey didn't raise any concerns about the actual condition of the property then I doubt they'll want more than the lack of consents sorted out (either by retrospectively getting it or an indemnity policy). If you want a structural survey that's up to you. The lender isn't going to unexpectedly pull out.
  • FreeBear
    FreeBear Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    jimbo772 wrote: »
    Since BR will take 6-8 weeks I am wondering if a structural survey will satisfy the lender (and myself)?


    A structural survey report may well satisfy the lender, but not having the BR certificates may well cause you a problem when you come to sell.
    Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
    Erik Aronesty, 2014

    Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.