UK Car Park Management Court Claim!!

Redx

Always take proof like wage slip etc on the day , it's been mentioned numerous times on here in other threads , see post #107 posted yesterday in here.

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5984829/letter-before-claim-excel&page=6

And read this similar one and the replies

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5989751/claim-form-vcs&page=2

A win is a win and will have cost them hundreds of pounds , plus not getting a penny of your money either , so well done

Another one bites the dust !!

nosferatu1001

£95 is a MAX. You needed to have the CPRs to hand - never assume, have proof - to show you are entitled and its not discretionary.

Kazaa

Ok so to confirm, for my next case, after the DJ dismisses the case, I should thank them and state now i wish to pursue my costs as stated in the CPR section 7.3 which states loss of earnings at a maximum of £95 and here is my payslip.

This time i didn't state the CPR section or mention it when asking for costs. Hopefully that would cover it.

beamerguy

Well done :beer:

DJ said you should be happy with the result, nodded his head up and down and said its been dismissed but I sat there thinking what is this, I was more interested in my costs tbh.

Some judges fail to understand about costs. Must have been one of the old school types who remembers the "nodding dog" we used to see in the back of cars in the last century.

BUT welcome to the ever increasing world of "the motorist zaps Gladstones" ?

Gladstones really are clowns ... they set up the scam IPC but fail to understand their own CoP

IT'S A WIN .... GLADSTONES SPANKED AGAIN

Coupon-mad

Kazaa wrote: »

Ok so to confirm, for my next case, after the DJ dismisses the case, I should thank them and state now i wish to pursue my costs as stated in the CPR section 7.3 which states loss of earnings at a maximum of £95 and here is my payslip.

This time i didn't state the CPR section or mention it when asking for costs. Hopefully that would cover it.

Yes!

And well done on your win. ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST!

If the next hearing is about the SAME SIGN, why not email the Claimant/solicitor now, and tell them to cancel and discontinue as their sign was found wanting and they have no cause of action...and that next time you will be citing the CPRs to ensure your costs are granted - so you urge them to cut their losses and give up.

:T

Kazaa

If only Coupon, the next case is me parking in my own gym, however the keypad didnt register my registration plate.
Crazy thing is the gym is willing to cancel but CEL just being an !!!!.

Coupon-mad

No legitimate interest then, and a breach of para 18 of Sch 2 of the CRA 2015.

Kazaa

Thanks Coupon, i been having a read is it definitely Para 18? As this talks about "Trader’s right to cancel without notice"

KeithP

Kazaa wrote: »

Thanks Coupon, i been having a read is it definitely Para 18? As this talks about "Trader’s right to cancel without notice"

No it doesn't.

Para 18 of Schedule 2 of CRA 2015 says:

18 A term which has the object or effect of obliging the consumer to fulfil all of the consumer's obligations where the trader does not perform the trader's obligations.