Excel Parking Services County Court Claim - Help With Defence Please

beamerguy

I note that within their statement, which they signed as a "statement of truth", they refer to £60 being within their T&C's ?? on their signs.

Do you have pictures of the signs that clearly shows this £60 which is easily readable ?

You no doubt have read other threads about ABUSE OF PROCESS and you should add this for the judge to read.
These are not just comments from the forum, these are real statements by REAL judges

This will apply to ALL companies/legals who abuse the system and an attempt to mislead the court

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

Redx

good point , if they added on spurious charges over the £175 or so limit then add all OF the abuse of process paragraphs BY COUPON-MAD to the WS

Snakes_Belly

Chaplair Ltd V Kumari relates to a case which involved a written contract and costs that were actually paid. They are using this case to justify their fake add on's. The cost in the Chaplair case related to management charges for a rental property which had been paid by the Claimant.

Is there anything in the contract which says that you should have moved your car? I doubt it.

Snakes_Belly

should have called the Helpline or found alternative parking.

Where does it say that you should have moved your car and carry a mobile phone in the contract (terms and conditions)?

Snakes_Belly

The Beavis case cannot apply to a contractor because you had a legitimate reason to be parked on the car park.

Snakes_Belly

I would not worry too much about the Claimant's seventy page WS. Concentrate on the main issues.

The advantage that you have over the Claimant is that you will fully understand the facts of your case and be able to maintain eye contact with the judge. The Claimant's representative will not be that familiar with the case and will faff about looking at their laptop or notes.

Coupon-mad

You don't appear to have done this as there's nothing in your draft WS that looks anything like the versions your search will have found, where people have TORN APART VCS' case, sentence by sentence, in detail which is what we need to see from you:

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Same as all the other VCS and Excel Witness statement templates on other threads, already torn apart on other posts loads of times. You were expecting this, I hope.

Rather than post here first, search the forum first. Pick a word from that WS such as a case surname (e.g. just the word 'Kumari') and search for that keyword here using ADVANCED SEARCH (show results as POSTS).

Job done!

No-one needs to tell you about Kumari or Vine v Waltham Forest or any of their case law because your searching will find it's already been done for you to copy.

Magpie2121

beamerguy wrote: »

I note that within their statement, which they signed as a "statement of truth", they refer to £60 being within their T&C's ?? on their signs.

Do you have pictures of the signs that clearly shows this £60 which is easily readable ?

There lots of signs around the car park. They are only clearly readable if you stand 2 feet away.

Here's an example. The sign is pretty high up



But if you go right up close to one of the signs, it reads as follows:

Magpie2121

Redx wrote: »

good point , if they added on spurious charges over the £175 or so limit then add all OF the abuse of process paragraphs BY COUPON-MAD to the WS

They are claiming £145 in total

Magpie2121

I took some photos today of the site at which my car was parked. My car was parked in the area of the 3rd photo.

They are claiming I parked in an area belonging to a client called TDR, although there are no signs anywhere to suggest this.