We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Capital gains tax on having lodgers
Comments
-
there are some respondents above who should not answer tax questions when it is apparent they know nothing about tax
OP, correct, if you have more than one lodger you lose your right to Private residence relief on the whole of the property
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/capital-gains-manual/cg64702
instead you become liable to CGT on the part that is let
the CGT rules are going to change in April 2020 so there really is no point giving you an answer based on today's rules as Letting relief (ie TCGA92/S223) is removed from that date
therefore you will be liable to CGT based on the % of the property let
there is no official formula for that calculation, you are supposed to use a "reasonable" method. Typically that means
either: number of rooms let
or square meters
the rooms method allows you to ignore bathrooms and toilets (and corridors, halls etc obviously)
for example: 2 lodgers, 3 bedroom house with lounge and kitchen = 5 rooms of which 2/5 or 40% is let
suppose you purchased for 100k and sold for 200k your taxable gain would be (200 - 100) = 100 x 40% = £40,000 - 11,700 CGT allowance = 28,300
with the income levels you mention in the OP, part of that would be taxed at 18% and part at 28%0 -
yes, he is , OP is running a lodgings business and therefore is operating a commercial property activity not simply owning their only/main (tax free) homeBut you’re not making a capital gain from your lodgers.... are you?
as aboveToasterScheme wrote: »^^This. no, not that at all
In 10 years time, the property will not have gone up in value BECAUSE you had lodgers in it. [It might do anyway, but only in the same way as it would do if you lived in it yourself] agreed, but irrelevant to the question
Unless maybe you're planning to sell it with the lodgers installed in some way? irrelevant
You pay income tax on lodger income. It's "Income from property" yes, so a different page on the self-assessment form - but never capital gains. yes, actually, always capital gains
I suspect you may have given different info to the accountant and to HMRC as this is bread and butter work for an accountant.I had this problem when I sold a house about 20 years ago. Interestingly, my accountant gave me very high figures, but when I talked it through with the tax office they gave me help with the calculations based on the percentage of the house occupied by lodgers over time (it had varied) and I ended up paying no CGT as we'd gradually reduced the number of lodgers and prior to selling I'd lived there on my own for long enough that it wasn't a problem.
letting relief covered a large part of the lodger gain, private residence relief obviously covers your own occupation and the final 36 months rule (as it was then) plus the cgt allowance probably absorbed any remaining taxable gain
BUT those rules don't now apply in OP's context0 -
collectors wrote: »avoid giving to any tax person that doesn't posses a birth certificate any of my hard earned money that i don't have to.
This is a curious prerequisite for paying tax.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards