We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Demolish or partially demolish and rebuild.

Does anyone know if it's easier planning permission wise to partiality demolish a house and extensively rebuild, than to completely demolish and start again ?

I ask as I've been watching two houses on my way to work for months now and can't understand how either would have been really worth doing.

1/ Small unmodernised bungalow on odd shaped medium sized plot. Sold, then watched it systematically demolished basically leaving the front door and a few feet of wall either side and odd internal wall.

It's now a full size two storey house, albeit now with no garden as such anymore.

2/ 1940's detatched house externally very presentable, roof totally removed and large extensions to both sides, and huge rear extension and new roof with loft rooms and dormers.

I would have thought it would have been possibly cheaper and less work to just bulldoze the houses and start totally afresh as they haven't retained any of either houses layout, character or any such thing.

So is it easier to get planning permission to make major structural changes even if you only retain a very small part of the original building, than to demolish, clear the site and start again with a total new build.

Wondered if it was a get around where you wouldn't get permission for a total new build in an area, to retain a minimal amout of the original house, so not classed as a new build which would get you permission.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.