Plevin claim limitations

Nasqueron

robtherelic wrote: »

To address the additional reasons you quote first, I agree, but 'for brevity' I quoted what is, I believe, most people's understanding of a case of a mis-sold PPI.

Nope. Most complaints on here are "I didn't know we had it" or "we were told we had to have it".

robtherelic wrote: »

As for me not understanding how it works, you then manage to disprove your own claim by stating that it is, in fact, possible to make Plevin only complaints. I don't wish to claim for mis-selling because I don't think I was mis-sold. My point is that fact should not and does not prevent me from making a Plevin claim against the PPI provider.

I didn't disprove anything, I never said you couldn't make Plevin only complaints, in fact, I pointed out that you can! What I actually said was that the vast majority (talking 99.99999% of complaints) want a full refund of their PPI premiums + the 8% associated interest, not just a Plevin consideration which also doesn't even apply for most people as PPI was largely discontinued by about 2009 and Plevin only covers that narrow period of sales ~2006 onwards AND under the CCA