We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SIPP - My Current Portfolio - Variety of Investments - Opinions/Comments ?

Options
12346»

Comments

  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Alexland wrote: »
    Some frauds only take a few people in the right departments.

    But as AlanP says, a fraud involving a few people would almost certainly not result in all funds being lost.

    Even if they stole enough millions that the company couldn't make it good, or borrow enough money against future profits to repair the damage, and it went into administration, the cost of the fraud would be spread across all investors. The FSCS limits would only bite if an individual's share of the shortfall was above £85,000.

    The closest thing we have as a parallel is the collapse of Beaufort, a deeply dodgy platform which was up to its neck in unregulated investments. In that case individual clients' losses were limited to £10,000, which means that after the increase in cover to £85,000, a platform collapse would have to be 8.5x worse than Beaufort for individual clients to lose money after the FSCS paid out.

    It's still not a terrible idea to have assets on different platforms; the biggest risk is not financial loss but being locked out of your money until the administration is sorted out.
  • BigBlueSky
    BigBlueSky Posts: 696 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm not particularly good with decisions, but I have now decided to go with the Vanguard Lifestrategy fund for ease. My decision now is the 80% or 100% equity, but thinking I may go for the 80% - Again for ease. I could also put some into the 100% at some point to give an equivalent of 90%.

    Is there any reason not to make a lump sum investment into VLS via the regular investment on 20th March rather than make the same investment manually on the same date ?? - Then I only pay £1.50 trading fee instead of £10.00 ?
  • MallyGirl
    MallyGirl Posts: 7,201 Senior Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Just set up the regular one - it may be a bit short in time as they allow several days between taking your money in by DD and making the regular trade. Then you can change it before next month. Save £8.50
    I’m a Senior Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Pensions, Annuities & Retirement Planning, Loans
    & Credit Cards boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com.
    All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
  • BigBlueSky
    BigBlueSky Posts: 696 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    MallyGirl wrote: »
    Just set up the regular one - it may be a bit short in time as they allow several days between taking your money in by DD and making the regular trade. Then you can change it before next month. Save £8.50

    Thanks. I usually add funds by debit card and then use my balance to purchase so that won't be a problem.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    BigBlueSky wrote: »
    Is there any reason not to make a lump sum investment into VLS via the regular investment on 20th March rather than make the same investment manually on the same date ?? - Then I only pay £1.50 trading fee instead of £10.00 ?

    The risk of you forgetting or somebody screwing something up, and the Direct Debit being collected a second time and draining your bank account?

    Have to say this had never occurred to me before, but if enough people did it I guess platforms would put a mechanism in place where if a Direct Debit is cancelled after one payment, a further charge is applied so that the transactions are charged at the lump sum rate.
  • Further to my initial post, I've been thinning out my investments so now have a total of 13 funds instead of the previous of approx 25.

    I'm still going to thin some of these out a little, due to some duplication.

    Does anyone have any suggestions?
    LEGAL & GENERAL(UNIT TRUST MNGRS) L&G US INDEX TRUST(I)ACC - £27,794.25
    SCHRODER UNIT TRUSTS UK DYNM SMLR COS Z ACC - £25,760.00
    LEGG MASON INVESTMENT FUNDS LTD IF ROYCE US SMLR COS X ACC - £20,694.58
    AXA FRAMLINGTON UNIT MANAGEMENT BIOTECH Z ACC - £9,991.46
    INVESCO FUND MANAGERS INVESCO HIGH INCOME UK Z ACC - £31,563.75
    FIRST STATE INVESTMENTS(UK) STEWART GBL EMG MKT LDRS B GBP ACC - £12,552.31
    BNY MELLON FUND MANAGERS LIMITED ASIAN INCOME INSTL W GBP DIS - £9,291.19
    KAMES CAPITAL PLC HIGH YIELD BOND B INSTL ACC NAV - £11,416.04
    FIL INVESTMENT SERVICES(UK)LIMITED INDEX UK P ACC NAV - £9,411.86
    BLACKROCK FUND MANAGERS LTD GOLD & GENERAL D ACC - £13,728.93
    ROYAL LONDON UNIT TRUST MANAGERS CORPORATE BOND M INC - £14,750.67
    ROYAL LONDON ASSET MGMT(IRL) STERLING EXTRA YIELD BOND A GBP INC - £20,858.80
    VANGUARD INVESTMENTS UK LTD LIFESTRATEGY 100 PERCENTAGE EQTY ACC NAV - 95,454.09

    Thanks in advance
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.