We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Joint borrower sole proprietor mortages - allowed to share ownership in future?
Options

tomocat3
Posts: 12 Forumite
I hear that going for a Joint borrower sole proprietor mortgage could allow a first time buyer to access a larger mortgage with help from someone who already owns a property, and crucially, avoid stamp duty that would otherwise be payable if the other person were also named on the needs of the property.
My understanding is that this type of mortgage avoids stamp duty by having only the first time buyer as the legal owner of the property. However, what is there to prevent the other person from being added on as a shared owner together with the first-time buyer at some future date after the purchase of the property has gone through?.
My understanding is that this type of mortgage avoids stamp duty by having only the first time buyer as the legal owner of the property. However, what is there to prevent the other person from being added on as a shared owner together with the first-time buyer at some future date after the purchase of the property has gone through?.
0
Comments
-
If you add them to the deed at a later point, they would then become liable for stamp duty at that point.I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
-
Regarding stamp duty."Where an individual (who is not a spouse or civil partner of another purchaser) is one of the purchasers of a dwelling but they will have absolutely no beneficial interest in the property, they will not be treated as a joint purchaser of that dwelling. This would have to be evidenced in writing. Any future entitlement to capital proceeds from the sale of the property, to income or to occupy the property would mean that they do have a beneficial interest."
No time limit.0 -
There is an article about joint borrower and sole proprietor mortgages and SDLT here: https://www.taxadvisermagazine.com/article/additional-properties
It tends not to work to have one party as the only owner if the other is putting in any capital.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards