We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
A couple of NTK questions
Mickey_Nine
Posts: 50 Forumite
I was wondering if someone could clarify somethings regarding POFA compliance on a NTK I am looking at.
1. There is no period of parking stated. Just the time of issue. However, there are two photos that are time stamped 10 minutes apart. Is that sufficient to fulfill the time period requirement?
2. I see people saying the 28 day warning must be verbatim to POFA. If it instead says "If within 28 days we have not received full payment or driver details, under Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, we have the right, subject to the requirements of the Act, to recover the parking charge amount that remains unpaid from the keeper of the vehicle." rather than
"warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given—"
Is a judge likely to ignore the different wording and deem it OK?
1. There is no period of parking stated. Just the time of issue. However, there are two photos that are time stamped 10 minutes apart. Is that sufficient to fulfill the time period requirement?
2. I see people saying the 28 day warning must be verbatim to POFA. If it instead says "If within 28 days we have not received full payment or driver details, under Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, we have the right, subject to the requirements of the Act, to recover the parking charge amount that remains unpaid from the keeper of the vehicle." rather than
"warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given—"
Is a judge likely to ignore the different wording and deem it OK?
Failed to load the poll.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards