We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Fobbed off by Nationwide?
Comments
-
Not at all - single premium loans are only considered poor due to the fact that most do not offer a pro-data rebates and as such when paying off early (commonly consolidating) this caused a greater cost to future loans as they would need to cover the insurance element that was not rebated.
If a pro-rats rebate loan were settled early or not would not make a difference as they would only pay for period policy was in place.0 -
-
As the loan were with Natiowide I’m afraid being single premium would not be an argument at all - Nationwide offered pro-rate rebates on early settlement, thus negating the usual uphold reason for single premium loans.
Loan was through Portman. Nationwide would have simply run off the mortgage book.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards