We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Complicated stamp duty question!

Hi folks, I have a home which is mortgaged in my sole name and I live in it. My partner (long distance relationship) has a home which is mortgaged in his sole name and he lives in it. With a view to moving in together in a year or 2 we are looking at him selling his house (soon) and buying another which he will live in for the time being till we move in together but will be in both our names.
So that will mean I’m on the deeds of 2 houses and on the mortgage for 2 houses although I won’t be paying anything for the new house till I move there. Will he still have to pay stamp duty at the higher rate on the new house seeing as my name will be on both? Value of new house approx 300k. Any advice welcomed!

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You own and live in house A now.
    He owns and lives in house B now.
    He sells house B, then you and he jointly buy and live in house C.

    So you currently own house A. You will own houses A & C.

    +3% SDLT will be due on the entirety of the purchase price.

    If you sell A within three years of buying C, then AIUI you should be good for the +3% being refunded, because you're changing your primary residence from A to C, even though you aren't doing that immediately after purchase.
  • Thank you for that, so it doesn’t make any difference that for a year or 2 I will still be living in house A and he will be living in house C?
  • Bossypants
    Bossypants Posts: 1,286 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    No, it wouldn't even make a difference if you never intended to live in house C or in any way profit from it. The only thing that counts is ownership/interest. When you already have an interest in one property and you gain another one without getting rid of the first, you become liable for the additional stamp duty, no ifs, ands or buts (except for being able to reclaim it if get rid of the first property within three years).

    I have to say, though, I'm struggling to see the benefit to anyone of you being on deeds and mortgage when you aren't planning to profit or contribute for at least a year, probably more? Why doesn't your boyfriend just sell his place and buy the new one himself, then you can talk about having you buy into that property once you are both ready to move in together? You can still choose it together and all of that, just keep the legals separate until you can take the next step.
  • Ok cool thank you for your help! There are reasons for doing it this way but it’s good to have a clearer picture ��
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thank you for that, so it doesn’t make any difference that for a year or 2 I will still be living in house A and he will be living in house C?
    It may do to the reclaiming if A is sold within three years.
    Bossypants wrote: »
    No, it wouldn't even make a difference if you never intended to live in house C or in any way profit from it.
    It certainly wouldn't be reclaimable in that case. It may if the OP moves from A to C and sells A within three years of purchasing C.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,956 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    So far as reclaiming the 3% is concerned, one of the conditions might be a particular problem here. If OP takes a share in the ownership in the new property when it is bought, then OP needs to have an intention as at the date of completion of the purchase, to live in the new property as OP’s main or only home. The HMRC guidance gives some clues as to how immediate that intention needs to be.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hence me saying "may".

    I'd say there clearly is an intention - but the question of "how immediate" makes it a tricky one.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.