We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tracy deposit dispute

I'm looking for some advice regarding a deposit dispute. Myself and my now ex-partner rented a property for 4 years. The deposit was lodged correctly in a government scheme in both our names with myself as the lead name.
Long story short, my wife and I separated and I moved out. The agent refused to simply remove me from the lease and forced my ex to reapply for a new lease in her some name which was approved.
My ex moved out of the property 18 months later and we requested the return of the deposit 50:50.
The landlord is now making a claim for damages to the full value of the deposit (£900).
We can and will be challenging their claim with supporting evidence but my question is can they make a claim against the deposit which was for the joint tenancy for claims arising from a different lease.
The deposit was never transferred into a new agreement when the lease changed.
Plenty of inspections were carried out (both jointly and in her sole lease) and no issues or damages were raised.
«1

Comments

  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Jimmy24680 wrote: »
    I'm looking for some advice regarding a deposit dispute. Myself and my now ex-partner rented a property for 4 years. The deposit was lodged correctly in a government scheme in both our names with myself as the lead name.
    Long story short, my wife and I separated and I moved out. The agent refused to simply remove me from the lease and forced my ex to reapply for a new lease in her some name which was approved.
    My ex moved out of the property 18 months later and we requested the return of the deposit 50:50.
    The landlord is now making a claim for damages to the full value of the deposit (£900).
    We can and will be challenging their claim with supporting evidence but my question is can they make a claim against the deposit which was for the joint tenancy for claims arising from a different lease.
    The deposit was never transferred into a new agreement when the lease changed.
    Plenty of inspections were carried out (both jointly and in her sole lease) and no issues or damages were raised.

    What advice are looking for? I might have missed it but I can't see a question? G_M's Guide to Tenancies in England/Wales sticky at the top of the board is a good starting place for information.
  • danlewi2
    danlewi2 Posts: 186 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    who is tracy?
  • CarrieVS
    CarrieVS Posts: 205 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Pixie5740 wrote: »
    What advice are looking for? I might have missed it but I can't see a question?
    Jimmy24680 wrote: »
    my question is can they make a claim against the deposit which was for the joint tenancy for claims arising from a different lease.

    Apparently I need to write at least 10 characters that aren't part of a quote.
  • danlewi2
    danlewi2 Posts: 186 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    but who is tracy?
  • (Assuming this is England no Scotland)





    Unless you agreed to the deposit being transferred to wife's new sole tenancy, suggest you follow Shelter's guide to getting YOUR deposit back from the ORDINAL tenancy.


    If you ever leave a joint tenancy in future simply serve valid NTQ and that will end tenancy for all joint tenancies.
  • tacpot12
    tacpot12 Posts: 9,351 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If your challenge to the claim is only partially successful, have you agreed with your ex how the deposit that is being returned is to be split?
    The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.
  • HampshireH
    HampshireH Posts: 4,986 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The landlord ahould have returned your deposit from the scheme when ending the joint tenancy.

    They should have then put your wifes deposit in the scheme and registered it.

    I would argue this point with them. If you are not on the tenancy your money should not be in a deposit scheme or in your name with a deposit scheme unless you gifted this to your wife and it was changed into her name.

    If this was the case then the recovery by the landlord is irrelevant to you and more a problem for your now ex.

    I've not read shelters guidance so thr above maybe factually incorrect but it seems logical.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Jimmy24680 wrote: »
    I'm looking for some advice regarding a deposit dispute. Myself and my now ex-partner rented a property for 4 years. The deposit was lodged correctly in a government scheme in both our names with myself as the lead name.
    Long story short, my wife and I separated and I moved out. The agent refused to simply remove me from the lease and forced my ex to reapply for a new lease in her some name which was approved.
    My ex moved out of the property 18 months later and we requested the return of the deposit 50:50.
    * I assume you have the original tenancy agreement (1).
    * I asume you (or ex) have the replacement tenancy agreement (2).

    So you have clear evidence that on or before the start date of 2) above, 1) above ended (whether by mutual agreement, notice whatever is irrelevant).

    So you put in a written request for the return in full of the deposit for 1) which should have been returned at/before the date of 2).

    Any deduction from that deposit would need to be supported by evidence which after all this time would be hard for the landlord to produce.

    If the LL wishes to claim for damage done during the recent tenancy 2), he could do so via court action against the sole tenant.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Never mind all that.
    We all want to know who Tracy is.
  • jimbog
    jimbog Posts: 2,271 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Lives here apparently
    latest?cb=20160827073933
    Gather ye rosebuds while ye may
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.