We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
[delete]
Comments
-
Does the defence need to be formatted in a specific way? i.e font style, font size, line spacing?
I've found that it needs to be Times New Roman, size 12 and 1.5 line height in here:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5546325/court-claim-procedure-updated-october-2016
If no one spots anything missing from the defence then I'll be printing this eve
0 -
You first posted your draft on Friday.If no one spots anything missing from the defence then I'll be printing this eve
Many people have better things to do at a weekend than reading Defences.
You have four weeks before your Defence is due.
Can I suggest you leave it at least a few more days for comment?
There is absolutely nothing to be gained by filing a Defence early.0 -
You first posted your draft on Friday.
Many people have better things to do at a weekend than reading Defences.
You have four weeks before your Defence is due.
Can I suggest you leave it at least a few more days for comment?
There is absolutely nothing to be gained by filing a Defence early.
Thanks Keith, I guess I was a little eager to get the Defence in! But you're right there is plenty of time 0 -
I've got just under 2 weeks before the deadline, I've just been reading through the ICO code of practice and found these points, so wonder if it's worth adding them into the defence:
Page 34, Paragraph 1 “Parking Charges arise in a number of different circumstances.
When a motorist parks on private land that you control, you will have put in place terms and
conditions by which motorists must abide if they wish to park on the land. If the motorist
abides by the conditions they enjoy the normal tariff for parking and no Parking Charges are
issued.
There is no ticket or pay and display, the sign simply states 'xxxxxx Customer Parking Only' with a small text underneath, there is also no APNR or instructions to record the VRN on the sign. I can upload a photo later to show exactly what it states.
There are also these points, but not sure they are strong enough to put in, even though the signage is very small.
Page 24, Part E, Paragraph 1 “…the signage within the site must be such as to be obvious to the motorist.
Page 24, Part E, Paragraph 2 “…Text should be of such a size and in and in a font that can be easily read by motorists”0 -
Case closed.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards