We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Compensation for a child RTC
Comments
-
-
If the accident was someone else's fault would you claim on her behalf?0
-
Take her to the fairground or out for a meal to say sorry, thats a plus for both of you.0
-
The more emphasis is placed on what are ultimately trivial and temporary injuries, the longer the effects on her mentality and mood will last.0
-
There is no requirement whatsoever for there to be a financial loss in order for the daughter to make a claim. Pain and suffering are in themselves grounds for a claim, actual financial losses can be claimed for in addition.Keep_pedalling wrote: »I can’t see that there is anything to claim for as in this case there are no financial losses. If her injuries were more severe then there might be e.g. someone having to take time off to look after her, or to private tutor if she was missing school.
In the face of it the OP's negligence has resulted in an injury to someone, so he has a liability to her, which in turn will be covered by his insurance. The liability doesn't go away just because the victim happens to be his daughter, or his passenger.
As the daughter is too young to bring a court action herself the insurers have asked the OP to decide on her behalf whether she wants to claim. If he decides not to then that isn't necessarily the end of the matter. The daughter can bring a claim herself if she wants to when she turns 18, and has until she is 21 to do it. In theory at least that's the situation - in practice she may find it difficult to gather evidence of a relatively minor injury four years or more after the fact.0 -
AndyMc..... wrote: »Why? The insurance will cover it.
Where does that come from? Premiums increase for everyone else.0 -
-
After ending up on the bonnet of a car after the driver failed to see a stationary cyclist, side on, directly in front of them in broad daylight and clearly visible to the 10 plus witnesses I didn't bother claiming for minor damage and an elbow bruised after denting her bonnet. I wonder if claiming compensation would increase the likelihood of being seen?diamond_dave wrote: »Got knocked off my bike a few years ago by an old guy in a car who turned left across me. Bounced down the road, went to A and E, but nothing broken, just bruised and shaken. Went to see the man a week later, just to chat, thinking he would be apologetic, but all he said was " -you shouldn't have been on the road ". Didn't claim any compensation as I was just glad to be alive. Too much compensation culture nowadays.0 -
where any puppies or kittens hurt?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards