We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Filling loop connected

Options
2»

Comments

  • DocQuincy
    DocQuincy Posts: 259 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Ruski wrote: »
    Tuppence worth: there is a risk no matter how small that the check valve can fail and users can leave the valve open.
    The only sure way to ensure complete non-contamination risk is to physically remove the connection, and that's why water regulations decree it.
    Hth
    Russ


    Thanks. But wouldn't you need three failures (assuming you don't leave the valves open)? Both valves for the filling loop and the one-way valve?
  • missile
    missile Posts: 11,763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Ruski wrote: »
    …. that's why water regulations decree it.

    Can you post a link to this decree? …………. :money:
    "A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
    Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:
  • Alex1983
    Alex1983 Posts: 958 Forumite
    I think your worrying far too much about this, they are hardly ever disconnected but....the water regs are clear about removing the filling hose or at least 1 end to prevent backflow regardless of check valve.
  • Rodders53
    Rodders53 Posts: 2,652 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    missile wrote: »
    Can you post a link to this decree? ………….
    It's definitely good practice to disconnect, but rarely done ;)... https://www.wras.co.uk/consumers/resources/interpretations_and_advice/backflow_prevention/b54/
  • DocQuincy
    DocQuincy Posts: 259 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks everyon for your input. I know it is unlikely to cause problems. It's good to know all this all the same.


    Rodders53 wrote: »
    It's definitely good practice to disconnect, but rarely done ;)... https://www.wras.co.uk/consumers/resources/interpretations_and_advice/backflow_prevention/b54/


    Your links says (bold mine):

    Where a closed circuit (heating system etc) has been categorised by the water undertaker as a fluid category 3 risk the installation of a compliant double check valve on the fill point connection to the supply/distribution pipe may be considered as acceptable backflow protection.[/QUOTE]



    Here's my boiler.


    https://imgur.com/DXsgka9



    Sorry I don't know the correct terminology but the pipe that goes into the left blue switch is one way. There is then a switch either side of the filling loop. Does this constitute “acceptable backflow protection” per the link?


    I'm not worried now thanks to your reassurances. I was just curious as to how there could possibly ever be any backflow since three things would have to fail at once (presuming you don't leave the valves open)?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.