We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Solicitor Dispute in Divorce

1235»

Comments

  • pphillips wrote: »
    It seems to me you have 3 different potential ways of defending the case:
    1. The contract was discharged by performance - this requires the contract to be completed so that the obligations come to an end. In other words, the further invoice was a mistake.
    2. The contract was discharged by agreement - this required both parties to agree to bring the contract to an end and release each other from it in a new contract requiring a payment.
    3 Estoppel by representation - this can be used to enforce a representation that was made by one person in order to induce the other person to make a payment in faith of their representation, when they later go on to deny it.


    So what happens if the client is overcharged on a final invoice and pays it? (See #36). By your argument the client couldn't claim it back


    I can only see the OP winning if the last invoice was raised in error. I would also expect a solicitors' invoice to explicitly exclude errors and omissions .


    I also can't believe that different laws apply to solicitors' invoices
  • pphillips
    pphillips Posts: 1,631 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    So what happens if the client is overcharged on a final invoice and pays it? (See #36). By your argument the client couldn't claim it back


    I can only see the OP winning if the last invoice was raised in error. I would also expect a solicitors' invoice to explicitly exclude errors and omissions .


    I also can't believe that different laws apply to solicitors' invoices

    The situation at #36 was that a payment had been made but the basis for that payment failed to materialise. If the payment had not been returned from the solicitor, the client could sue the solicitor on the basis that:
    A. The solicitor breached the contract due to a partial failure of consideration, or
    B. The law of restitution allows for recovery because the solicitor has been unjustly enriched.

    It is not the case that different laws applies to solicitors' invoices. However, solicitors are required to follow the ethical and accounting regulations that have been set by their regulator.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.