We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

What is your personal opinion on rtb policy?

Enlighten us all here :D
«13

Comments

  • sevenhills
    sevenhills Posts: 5,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If it benefits me to the tune of £30,000, I am in favour.


    If it benefits someone else to the tune of £30,000 I think its outrageous and a disastrous give away.


    ;)
  • gomer
    gomer Posts: 1,473 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm in love lol x
  • Marvel1
    Marvel1 Posts: 7,462 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Whoever suggests to get rid of RTB in the next election gets my vote.
  • sevenhills
    sevenhills Posts: 5,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Marvel1 wrote: »
    Whoever suggests to get rid of RTB in the next election gets my vote.


    Maybe just reducing the discount would be a start, we need to build more, that is the problem.
  • gomer
    gomer Posts: 1,473 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Marvel1 wrote: »
    Whoever suggests to get rid of RTB in the next election gets my vote.

    Your reason?
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
  • sevenhills wrote: »
    Maybe just reducing the discount would be a start, we need to build more, that is the problem.

    While building more is indeed needed the reality is that if you sell off existing council or housing association homes that are affordable you don't help the people that are in need of affordable housing right now. Many people are in private housing just barely getting by due to rents being unaffordable but having no other option.
    RTB should be scrapped (exceptions for those with adapted homes who should have the option. However it should be stated that within 2 years of the death of the person needing the adaption they sell it back to the council and leave so it can be used by someone needing it, only not having to do so if someone else living in said home also needs the adaptions. Basically if it gets sold it goes back to the council only so kind of on loan so stock doesn't go down).
    More affordable housing should be built and RTB not an option for the majority. Those that get RTB on the 'adaption scheme' know it is on the basis that stock is given back when no longer needed or they want to move and sell.
    I am a vegan woman. My OH is a lovely omni guy :D
  • Marvel1
    Marvel1 Posts: 7,462 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    gomer wrote: »
    Your reason?

    They are meant for people who need them, if they can afford to buy then buy a private one, so that someone in need can take their place, like they needed.

    Also the fact that some can rent it out, are they too going to offer cheap rent? Nope, just greed.

    Also we mostly see threads on here about RTB are from young adults wanting to buy it - their parents are the ones on the tenancy (or whatever they call it). They make something up, it's my childhood home blah blah blah, let's cut the crap, you want a cheap house and to screw over your parents who are secure.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    It wouldn't seem so bad if everybody had an equal choice to be in that position...

    As a single person, where I grew up, I was on the list over 10 years and phoned them to ask "how long do you think..." and they said "another 20 years to get a room in a shared house" as they simply didn't have/build/own any single person little places (it was a village/rural).

    It's a "hand out" for the lucky .... most often "families" and "couples" ... as "single" seems to always be back of the queue for anything in life.

    If the cherry came round to all of us and we all had a chance to bite it ..... then it's "fair dos"... but it's a skewed system for many.
  • seven-day-weekend
    seven-day-weekend Posts: 36,755 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 10 December 2018 at 3:04PM
    I have changed my opinion over the last two decades.

    My opinion now is this : Sell off all old and hard-to-maintain housing stock, giving sitting tenants the first option (maybe with a small discount to encourage them to buy it).

    Then use the money to build new housing stock, which is more in keeping with the housing needs of today. Offer this to tried and tested tenants who are living in an older property and wish to upgrade, and fill the vacated older properties with those on the waiting list. If there is then spare capacity in the new houses, give it to people on the waiting list, but with a twelve-month 'trial' tenancy. If at the end of this they have not paid their rent, or looked after the place, without a good reason, turf them out.

    That way the Council gets better housing stock AND more responsible tenants.

    ETA : No house under 30 years old should be eligible for RTB and people should have been tenants for at least ten years.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.