Brittania PPC Newbie post

Taliessa

Yes will do, I have the post, thankyou so much

Taliessa

Hi there, I am just finishing up with my defence to e-mail to the court but just wondering about one issue? In the full defence points by Coupon-Mad I noticed this wording -

"The court is invited to note that no named Solicitor has signed the Particulars, in breach of Practice Direction 22, and rendering the statement of truth a nullity. "

Just wondering if I should include or cut this? The court claim form has been signed by a 'Zarvin Vandrewala' and on the BWLegal website he is listed as 'the Supervising Solicitor' so even though this is clearly the robo-claim that Coupon-Mad is stating are they no longer in breach of Practice Direction 22 if they are getting their supervising solicitor to sign all the claim forms?

beamerguy

Taliessa .... I don't know the answer to that one.

The highlight of your conversation with the Judge is .....
ABUSE OF PROCESS
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

Taliessa

Ok thanks.....

Coupon-mad

Just wondering if I should include or cut this? The court claim form has been signed by a 'Zarvin Vandrewala' and on the BWLegal website he is listed as 'the Supervising Solicitor' so even though this is clearly the robo-claim that Coupon-Mad is stating are they no longer in breach of Practice Direction 22 if they are getting their supervising solicitor to sign all the claim forms?

I say cut the line out, if your claim is signed by a named person.

A truly horrible job, nothing to crow about, Zarvin:

https://www.bwlegal.co.uk/news/working-at-bw-legal-litigation/

We always understand that there is a human being on the other side of a letter or a telephone call and we try to deal with them in the same way we would want to be dealt with.

I can honestly say I've NEVER read a post by anyone who says that BW Legal dealt with them fairly.

Taliessa

"I can honestly say I've NEVER read a post by anyone who says that BW Legal dealt with them fairly."

I made ONE phone call to BWLegal (before I read advice to never ever phone them) as their letter said to call so they could 'help me to sort things out.' The guy on the phone was actually really nice and respectful and I was pleasantly surprised. I made it quite clear I disputed the charge. However, short lived as I had given them my phone number. They proceeded to then call me or text me EVERY SINGLE DAY after that phone call!! After a week or so I had to block them as it was really upsetting me.

Taliessa

"The highlight of your conversation with the Judge is .....
ABUSE OF PROCESS"

So 'Abuse of Process' is the number one point here? Before unclear signage and landowner authority? Should I highlight this at the very top of my defence?

beamerguy

Taliessa wrote: »

"I can honestly say I've NEVER read a post by anyone who says that BW Legal dealt with them fairly."

I made ONE phone call to BWLegal (before I read advice to never ever phone them) as their letter said to call so they could 'help me to sort things out.' The guy on the phone was actually really nice and respectful and I was pleasantly surprised. I made it quite clear I disputed the charge. However, short lived as I had given them my phone number. They proceeded to then call me or text me EVERY SINGLE DAY after that phone call!! After a week or so I had to block them as it was really upsetting me.

Spells out BWLegal, the Kray Twins style bullies

Coupon-mad

So 'Abuse of Process' is the number one point here?

NO.

It's a secondary argument, just damage limitation to peg the disputed sum at £100.

Read Johnersh's post (and mine) on the Abuse of Process thread.

beamerguy

Taliessa wrote: »

"The highlight of your conversation with the Judge is .....
ABUSE OF PROCESS"

So 'Abuse of Process' is the number one point here? Before unclear signage and landowner authority? Should I highlight this at the very top of my defence?

I personally think that a judge is made aware quickly of such abuse with reference to what other judges have said.

If the judge decides it is abuse of process and strikes out the case, then everything else fails. DJ Taylor in Southampton decided on Abuse of Process before there was a hearing

Then, there is the fact as explained by Jonnersh in this thread

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/75929156#Comment_75929156

POST # 36

Like you, BWL signs off as a statement of truth. That will include their fake claim of £60