We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is visa breaking the law?

Jedi_dave
Posts: 1 Newbie
Recently had an issue with my Halifax visa debit card. What I thought was a one off payment was being taken out monthly. I asked my branch to stop the payment and was told that has I had just received a new card it would automatically be stopped. Alas that didn't work and deductions continued. I asked why and was told visa had given my new card details to the company taking my money.
My thoughts are why have my details been retained. Why have visa passed on my new details without my consent and should it have been made more clear that multiple payments were allowed on a debit card.
I have been told I can apply for a refund but the process would be like negotiating Brexit.
Any insight please
My thoughts are why have my details been retained. Why have visa passed on my new details without my consent and should it have been made more clear that multiple payments were allowed on a debit card.
I have been told I can apply for a refund but the process would be like negotiating Brexit.
Any insight please
0
Comments
-
CPAs always continue across replacement cards. They're not breaking the law.
However, they were wrong to tell you that payments would not continue.
Cancel the payment with either the company or the bank, but remember that that doesn't cancel any contract.0 -
What I thought was a one off payment was being taken out monthly.
What payments are being taken monthly?
You can certainly cancel either of these with the Bank, but that won't stop the company you agreed to pay from chasing you for what you'll then owe.
Did you perhaps cancel the original card in the hope that this would end the DD/CPA?0 -
CPA can be cancelled by the bank but it doesn't stop a contract being enforced if you agreed to pay the firm. Tell the firm you wish to cancel it and follow up with the bank if they refuse/don't respond.
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards