We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

NTK date issue

To quote from elsewhere :


the NTK must arrive with you between day 29 and day 57 if there was a windscreen PCN.



Ok short version here.


Ticket was issued on windscreen on 24/9/2017


Formal demand was sent to registered keeper on 26th October.


trasfer of liability (but no driver acknowledged) was sent and another formal demand was sent on 21st novemeber.




Question is. If the first formal demand (which has been taken as a NTK) was dated 26th October did the PCC go against any rules regarding the 28 day grace period before finding out contact details?


Also if the 2nd formal demand was dated 21st november that makes it day 58 ?



Does this make a case easier to defend?
Speak your mind.- Nobody else will do it for you.

Comments

  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    not if the PPC issued the NTK on day 29 or later (in this case around day 32)

    if they sent the NTK between day 29 and day 56 to the keeper and if they ALSO have the warning about POFA2012 liability, then the KEEPER may be liable under POFA for what a driver did

    the second demand to the keeper is the final warning and is irrelevant as far as POFA is concerned
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Is this related to [URL="https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5925149other thread?[/URL]

    If so, please ask a Board Guide to merge your threads. Thanks.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.