We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Renewed tenancy direct with landlord- need advice

Hi

Iv trawled the internet and forum but am struggling to find an answer to my query

We moved into a rented property back in 2015 and signed a 6 month tenancy via a letting agent with the landlord managing the property directly. The agents sorted the deposit protection and the agreement included us paying a £75 ‘moving out fee’ to the agent when we move out.

At the end of the 6 months we signed up for another 6 months (and subsequently signed further renewals) directly with the landlord, we’ve had no dealing with the agents in the last 3 years. The new agreements we have signed are literally 2 pages long just confirming the new dates and signatures.

We are approaching the point where we are looking to move out and:

1) are we obliged to pay the moving out fee still now that we signed paperwork direct with the landlord?
2) should the landlord of protected our deposit directly with the deposit holders as it seems odd we have to go to the old agent to get this back?

Any help or advice would really be appreciated

Thanks
«1

Comments

  • HampshireH
    HampshireH Posts: 5,032 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Do you pay rent via the agent? From what you said it sounds like they are just dealing with collection of monies

    No reason why if they are still employed by the LL and they registered tour depoait there should be an issue.
  • HampshireH
    HampshireH Posts: 5,032 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    That should have been *your deposit.
  • Bleon
    Bleon Posts: 20 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts
    Thanks for the reply, the rent goes directly to the landlord, i believe they are under the impression the contract is rolling periodically but its not and we have always signed a new agreement with the landlord

    It’s more re the moving out fee, it’s not a lot of money but I would rather not have to pay it. It’s written into the original tenancy that the moving out fee is deducted from our deposit, however the subsequent agreements directly with the landlord don’t note this?
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Bleon wrote: »
    Thanks for the reply, the rent goes directly to the landlord, i believe they are under the impression the contract is rolling periodically but its not and we have always signed a new agreement with the landlord

    It’s more re the moving out fee, it’s not a lot of money but I would rather not have to pay it. It’s written into the original tenancy that the moving out fee is deducted from our deposit, however the subsequent agreements directly with the landlord don’t note this?

    Your contract is with the landlord not the letting agent. It's down to the landlord to decide how much, if any, can be deducted from your deposit regardless of who registered it in the first place. The latest incarnation of your tenancy agreement doesn't mention the fee so I don't see how it can be deducted from your deposit. There appears to be some mis-communication between the landlord and his agent but that is down for the pair of them to sort out and has nothing to do with your contract with the landlord.
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,237 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It sounds as though the new tenancy agreement replaces the original one and the terms have changed so they don't include the check out fee.
    In relation to the deposit, if the agents try to deduct the fee then challenge it through whichever scheme the deposit is protected with.
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
  • saajan_12
    saajan_12 Posts: 5,769 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Bleon wrote: »
    Hi

    Iv trawled the internet and forum but am struggling to find an answer to my query

    We moved into a rented property back in 2015 and signed a 6 month tenancy via a letting agent with the landlord managing the property directly. The agents sorted the deposit protection and the agreement included us paying a £75 ‘moving out fee’ to the agent when we move out.

    At the end of the 6 months we signed up for another 6 months (and subsequently signed further renewals) directly with the landlord, we’ve had no dealing with the agents in the last 3 years. The new agreements we have signed are literally 2 pages long just confirming the new dates and signatures.- please quote the new 2 page agreements: do they reference the original tenancy and effectively say all original terms carry through with dates changed, or do they completely replace the old terms?

    We are approaching the point where we are looking to move out and:

    1) are we obliged to pay the moving out fee still now that we signed paperwork direct with the landlord? - depends if the new agreements fully replace the original or if the original terms still stand with just dates changed.
    2) should the landlord of protected our deposit directly with the deposit holders as it seems odd we have to go to the old agent to get this back? - its always up to the LL to ensure the deposit is protected by someone. You should ask for your deposit back and if yo ucan't agree on deductions then go to the protection scheme. Who you deal with (LL or agent) is likely irrelevant.

    Any help or advice would really be appreciated

    Thanks

    Please quote the actual terms of the latest agreement: I suspect either
    a) if the old terms carry through -> the £75 fee may still apply; or
    b) if no reference is made to an earlier agreement then the live contract has no fee due -> dispute any deduction by showing the latest agreement.

    Re deposit, ask the LL for its return and initially follow their instructions re whom to contact. However if you don't have any success, then you cna just claim it from the deposit scheme. If it isn't protected at all then you can sue the LL for the penalty.
  • Bleon
    Bleon Posts: 20 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts
    Thank you so much for your help

    The new contract only mentions our names, address’, length of tenancy, monthly rental and signatures. Literally that is it, no other info whatsoever.

    I’m aware I was probably extremely naive to sign it. If i have to pay the fee it will be lesson learnt

    I understand what everyone is saying though and it’s helpful to know I should only be concerned with dealing with the LL are the deposit
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Bleon wrote: »
    Thank you so much for your help

    The new contract only mentions our names, address’, length of tenancy, monthly rental and signatures. Literally that is it, no other info whatsoever.
    And yet you say it "literally 2 pages long ..." - how can that take 2 pages?
    It really is important to quote exactly. This could either be a
    * renewal or
    * new tenancy agreement
    and it makes a big difference which

    I’m aware I was probably extremely naive to sign it.
    I have no idea why you think this

    If i have to pay the fee it will be lesson learnt
    if you have been renewing the original contract every 6 months, then the original clause relating to the £75 is valid and could be enforced (though it may not be).
    if you have been signing brand new contracts, then the terms of the original contract are irrelevant.

    I understand what everyone is saying though and it’s helpful to know I should only be concerned with dealing with the LL are the deposit
    Ignore the agent - you have no contract with them. Serve your notice (properly!) on the LL and claim back your deposit from the LL.
  • Bleon
    Bleon Posts: 20 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts
    G_M wrote: »
    Ignore the agent - you have no contract with them. Serve your notice (properly!) on the LL and claim back your deposit from the LL.

    The second page is purely the signatures, the first page sets out the other info. There is no mention of the word renewal although to be fair our txt message correspondence did refer to the ‘contract being for renewal’

    Thanks for your help

    I feel naive for signing a tenancy with such little info and not clarifying prior to signing
  • You might have a contract with the LA.

    When you applied for the property did you sign anything that agreed what charges would be applicable and when sometimes they are called Tenancy Fee Declaration Forms. Ask the LA for a copy - nothing signed could mean you are not liable for the charge.

    If its referred to in the AST only - when did they provide the AST as you cant be liable for reasonable charges that you weren't made aware in advance of signing the AST. ie if charges only brought to your attention on signing AST then you could argue not paying.

    The landlord might have employed the agent to hold and register the security deposit for him even though he is managing the property and then at the end of the tenancy the LA agent may carry out some kind of "checkout" service to which you could be liable for a charge.

    Which scheme is the deposit held and who provided you with the relevant certificate and prescribed information?

    The landlord is still responsible for agreeing deductions with you directly even if the LA holds the deposit.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.