Mis-sold Packaged Bank Account
edited 4 December 2018 at 12:11AM
in Reclaiming mortgage fees, council tax, etc
9 replies
2.4K views

14 Posts
10 years ago I obtained a packaged bank account which offered travel insurance. I was diagnosed with a medical condition prior to that. I am fairly sure that they didn't ask me about that medical condition. Moneysavingexpert's article suggests I am able to reclaim fees.
I may have the complete records of opening the account but I may not, I will have to dig them out. I also may well not have all my bank statements.
Do I need these to successfully claim? How could they offer a refund of fees when there could be no records?
I may have the complete records of opening the account but I may not, I will have to dig them out. I also may well not have all my bank statements.
Do I need these to successfully claim? How could they offer a refund of fees when there could be no records?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Childcare budget boost
More support for children from nine months and those on Universal Credit
MSE News
Replies
not necessarily. You dont need to be eligible for every part of a PBA. As long as the majority of the things are or that there are specific things you have utilised.
You dont need to.
No. You are free to put your complaint in without them.
As long as you still bank with them, they will have records. However, do note that most PBA complaints are now timebarred. Yours may not be but you need to be prepared for that.
Most of the Packaged Account's travel insurance sections have a large list of medical conditions which are "No Screen" ie you do not need to declare them to the travel insurer as they are covered automatically with no problem. Have you checked whether your condition is covered? Not much point in complaining about a medical condition which would be covered anyway.
The value of these uses will be taken off any refund you get and you will of course lose this cover when they downgrade your account (if you haven't already). If this means your account total refund is less than the value of the cover benefits used you would get nothing)
“I think that the Government are right to apply to join the European Economic Community...” -Winston Churchill 1961
“The future of Europe if Britain were to be excluded is black indeed.”[FONT="][FONT="][FONT="] - Winston Churchill 1963
[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]
@Nearlyold - I hadn't checked but I just did and it appears from the list that it is not a no screen condition.
@Nasqueron - Well I only called out the AA a few times. Interesting info.
Closing the account in 2013 triggers the 3 year time bar, as it was opened more than 6 years ago, that rule is cleared too. Unfortunately you won't get around a correctly applied time bar.
That said, your complaint reason is very weak, banks offered multiple accounts to customers, it was highly unlikely you would only have been offered a packaged account if you wanted a new current account.
“I think that the Government are right to apply to join the European Economic Community...” -Winston Churchill 1961
“The future of Europe if Britain were to be excluded is black indeed.”[FONT="][FONT="][FONT="] - Winston Churchill 1963
[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]
As mentioned, the FCA do not handle consumer complaints. They will just forward your letter onto Barclays. Who will then in turn refer you back to their original decision.
This means you are too late to complain. The FCA has a 6 year and 3 year rule. Both of which need to be met to apply a timebar. For a timebar to apply it has to be more than 6 years from the opening of the account and more than 3 years from being reasonably aware of an issue.
You opened the account 15 years ago. So, that is way past the 6 year point.
You changed the account to a free one in 2013. So, that is a trigger to start the three year clock. So, you had to complain by 2016.
So, the timebar seems to be applied correctly in this case. (and most PBAs are timebarred nowadays).