We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Jack Bogle warning on Indexing getting too big
Zola.
Posts: 2,204 Forumite
https://citywireselector.com/news/vanguard-founder-rings-alarm-bell-over-index-domination/a1181243
Very interesting view point - although I wonder just how long this would take to come to fruition..
Very interesting view point - although I wonder just how long this would take to come to fruition..
0
Comments
-
There does seem to be quite a leap from "US index mutual funds have bloomed from 4.5% of the total US stock market in 2002 to 17% at present" to "It seems only a matter of time until index mutual funds cross the 50% threshold"!Very interesting view point - although I wonder just how long this would take to come to fruition..
Another way of looking at it would be that index fund share has increased by 12.5 percentage points in 16 years, so, if that growth was linear, it would take another 42 years to reach 50%. No particular reason to suspect linearity (he does suggest it's accelerating) but equally there's no particular reason to suspect that demand for such funds is infinite, especially once the bull run ends.
However, I'm sure he's much more attuned to US market conditions than I am!0 -
Very interesting. It would be too much power in too few hands, on the one hand a cosy "rich club" where innovation is stifled and average performance rewarded handsomely irrespective of failure, or on the other voting for total focus on only short term gains to the detriment of long term growth and employment?0
-
-
Very interesting. It would be too much power in too few hands, on the one hand a cosy "rich club" where innovation is stifled and average performance rewarded handsomely irrespective of failure, or on the other voting for total focus on only short term gains to the detriment of long term growth and employment?
The fund managers ultimately become the market. Who do they sell to for example? That's one of the challenges being posed.
Investors would opt for an alternative fad instead.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
