We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Vendor does not have Landlord's consent for alterations
Options

onix22
Posts: 53 Forumite

Hi all,
We are FTB in process of buying a flat and nearly at the exchange we found out the buyer does not have any documents related to alterations of the flat.
The Property has been altered. A stud wall was put up to make a second bedroom approximately eight to 10 years ago. The vendor states that Building Control attended the Property and signed-off with her builder regarding the fire doors. She also had some correspondence with the Landlord at that time who approved the works prior to it taking place, however, has not retained any paperwork.
Our solicitor advised us either to ask the seller to obtain retrospective consent which may take a considerable amount in time or ask the seller to put in place an indemnity policy which will cover your costs if the landlord ever challenged the works to the property.
We are afraid we will have problems in a future sale if there is no documentation from the landlord.
Would an indemnity policy suffice for peace of mind?
Thank you!
We are FTB in process of buying a flat and nearly at the exchange we found out the buyer does not have any documents related to alterations of the flat.
The Property has been altered. A stud wall was put up to make a second bedroom approximately eight to 10 years ago. The vendor states that Building Control attended the Property and signed-off with her builder regarding the fire doors. She also had some correspondence with the Landlord at that time who approved the works prior to it taking place, however, has not retained any paperwork.
Our solicitor advised us either to ask the seller to obtain retrospective consent which may take a considerable amount in time or ask the seller to put in place an indemnity policy which will cover your costs if the landlord ever challenged the works to the property.
We are afraid we will have problems in a future sale if there is no documentation from the landlord.
Would an indemnity policy suffice for peace of mind?
Thank you!
0
Comments
-
What are you buying. Are you paying for a 2 bed flat or are you paying for a 1 bed with one of the rooms divided up to make it smaller by adding a bedroom? There could be a huge difference in price between a 1 bed that hasn't been altered and a 2 bed that is exactly the same size but has had one room divided into two.0
-
If you’re happy with the flat and that the two new bedrooms are both of adequate size to properly be used as bedrooms, i’d be going with the indemnity.
If they are tiny, or one is, or the wall is flimsy, or the layout is awkward, that will be the issue not the paperwork!0 -
It may be worth reading the lease, to help you with your decision.
It might say:
a) No alterations
b) No alterations without the consent of the Landlord/Freeholder
If the landlord finds out about the wall and denies giving consent (and you have no docs to prove otherwise) ...
If the lease says a), the worst case scenario is that the landlord makes you remove the wall.
If the lease says b), the worst case scenario is probably that you have to pay fees for retrospective consent, and a new lease plan.0 -
It may be worth reading the lease, to help you with your decision.
It might say:
a) No alterations
b) No alterations without the consent of the Landlord/Freeholder
If the landlord finds out about the wall and denies giving consent (and you have no docs to prove otherwise) ...
If the lease says a), the worst case scenario is that the landlord makes you remove the wall.
If the lease says b), the worst case scenario is probably that you have to pay fees for retrospective consent, and a new lease plan.
The Lease states 'No alterations wothout consent'.
However, the vendor declared the stud wall was erected 8 years ago. Does the 4 year rule apply here? Would the alteration become lawful after this period? Shall we ask for a certificate of lawfulness, do you think it would help?
Our main concern would be a future sale.0 -
Is your lender aware and if so what is their position ?0
-
AnotherJoe wrote: »Is your lender aware and if so what is their position ?0
-
AnotherJoe wrote: »Is your lender aware and if so what is their position ?
No, they are not aware. Do we need too inform them?0 -
If we want to make any alterations in the future, will the indemnity insurance become invalid? What will be the consequences for us?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards