Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Worth a letter?
Comments
-
Ok, it's not 12 months until next year and it's the beginning of Nov now. So based on the 12 month guarantee per the OP, it was bought in Sept 2006.
The OP has a slip with the works completed on it. So, the OP may also have the time on the job listed as suggested by another poster.
Word against word is just that. Neither party has enough evidence to prove each other wrong in that case. So, it comes down to pressure and who backs down first.
It's always worth a go rather than pay yourself for someone elses incompetance.:rotfl: It's better to live 1 year as a tiger than a lifetime as a worm...but then, whoever heard of a wormskin rug!!!:rotfl:0 -
Thanks for all your input, ill update tomorrow when I have the paperwork in front on me
0 -
leaving out whether the comet engineer did or did not change the stat, its worth checking if the repair itself carries a warranty. I work for a whitegoods manufacturer and if our engineer repairs an appliance then that repair/part is guaranteed for a year.0
-
Iamthesmartestmanalive wrote: »You can't prove anything and to go back a year down the line and dispute it is not going to get you anywere
They came out and fixed it, you didnt use it again so it could be the thermostat has became faulty again through non use
In Small claims court the burden of proof is not as severe as you would make out, IMO a judge would find based on the evidence presented here, and witness testimony, that the cooker could not have been fixed at the time. So in this respect she can prove her case.
She cannot prove it to Comet, because they will not want to know anyway, they only listen if you take them to court.
Your last para shows you didn't read the OP. why bother to comment if you don't read/understand the OP? - Unless ofcourse you were paraphrasing how Comet would view the matter.0 -
unless of course you were paraphrasing how Comet would view the matter.
or his name is Dave Brooker? :rotfl:
Assuming that you have an engineers report clearly stating that the stat had not previously been replaced, I would go down the Small Claims Court route.
I hate Comets attitude towards after sales, it's only rivalled by the DSG Group's.My farts hospitalize small children
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179.1K Life & Family
- 264K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
