We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mortgage protection.
Ms_Mop_123
Posts: 83 Forumite
Was talking to my daughter today about mortgages, I told her that when we took our mortgage out in 1974 we were told that we had to take out mortgage protection (life insurance) otherwise we couldn't get a mortgage. She's told me that's PPI and we should see about making a claim, is she right?
0
Comments
-
No.
Life insurance isn't PPI.0 -
Thanks, it's just that she says you don't have to take out life insurance when you get a mortgage now, but at the time we were told we had to by the building society.0
-
They were allowed to do that then.Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi0
-
Ms_Mop_123 wrote: »Thanks, it's just that she says you don't have to take out life insurance when you get a mortgage now, but at the time we were told we had to by the building society.
Things were different then.
It was ok to smoke in the doctor's waiting room, but they're not so keen on that now.0 -
What you need to remember is 2 things
1) Simply having insurance isn't wrong, only if it was miss-sold
2) If a lender insisted you have some cover (such as life insurance) or no mortgage it categorically CANNOT be miss-sold as you have a choice of loan + insurance or go elsewhere
PPI was a product of the 80s (mostly mid to late 80s), you were not sold PPI in 1974, you were sold life insurance, that is not PPI, that protects the remaining borrower if the other died by paying off the mortgage.
You were not miss-sold, move on and be glad you never had to claim on this policy.Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
Thank you all for your prompt replies, I will tell my daughter what's been said on here. She might be a bit disappointed though, she said she wanted 10% of anything we got.0
-
Ms_Mop_123 wrote: »Was talking to my daughter today about mortgages, I told her that when we took our mortgage out in 1974 we were told that we had to take out mortgage protection (life insurance) otherwise we couldn't get a mortgage. She's told me that's PPI and we should see about making a claim, is she right?
She has told you wrong.
Life assurance is not PPI. Only PPI is PPI. Life assurance is life assurance.
Until the late 90s, it was compulsory to have life assurance as a condition of borrowing. It is unusual nowadays but does still happen sometimes on commercial borrowing.She might be a bit disappointed though, she said she wanted 10% of anything we got.
To avoid future disappointment, you may like to tell her car insurance and house insurance is not PPI either.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Dunstonh....thank you for your reply. When I put she wanted 10% of any monies we received with was put in jest, I tried to put a laughing emoji but I had to edit the post because it didn't appear properly when posted. Of course she knows that car and house insurance is not PPI.
I can understand why she thought we may be entitled to something back. Lots of PPI were miss-sold, people told they had to have it, just like we were told we had to have mortgage protection. Seems from what you put it was compulsory when we took our mortgage out, unlike it is today.
I did get a little excited about the prospect though of claiming something.....I'd better stop dreaming about the world cruise now.0 -
Of course she knows that car and house insurance is not PPI.
And the same applies to any other insurance that is not PPI. Such as life assurance.Lots of PPI were miss-sold, people told they had to have it, just like we were told we had to have mortgage protection. Seems from what you put it was compulsory when we took our mortgage out, unlike it is today.
But it is not PPI. So, saying that lots of people were missold PPI. So, I am going to complain about my life assurance has as much in common as saying lots of people were missold PPI so I am going to complain about my house insurance.
Compulsory insurance still exists today and is allowed. It is not a valid complaint reason. Lenders still insist on buildings insurance as a condition of borrowing. A very small number still insist on life assurance as a condition. That is not a missale reason with PPI or any other type of insurance. It is if you are lied to over it being compulsory when it was not. However, it is also one of the weakest complaint reasons going as there is almost certainly no evidence to back the allegation up.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

