We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Roundabout accident - Court Proceedings
Comments
-
https: //m.imgur. com/a/qIZCp
Link to an image of roundabout just before point of collision and exit. Link has spaces so remove them.0 -
Norman_Castle wrote: »Find it on google maps and post the https with a few spaces.
If you do this thread will turn into a massive flame war about who was in the wrong, how you should behave at roundabouts etc etc
That's not what the OP is asking about.Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.0 -
https://m.imgur.com/a/qIZCp
So Marston Green, just after the B4438 turn off
https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4646859,-1.7106332,3a,75y,283.75h,68.91t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1scbq3MS6kkGN_1ZydcBvj1w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Motorbike in lane one (straight ahead only as per road marking and sign) and you in lane 2 (straight ahead or right). Motorbike decides not to go on Solihull Parkway but tries to stay on roundabout and collides with OP who is taking the Solihull Parkway exit in lane 2 as required. Lane markings and signs make it a cut and dried case that the motorbike was in the wrong and caused the accident by hitting the OP who was proceeding correctly.
What the courts will decide is different but the road layout says they're in the wrong unless the bike was trying to move into lane 2 before the junction and they came together but the signs further back give you plenty of warning and the motorbike would only need to go about 500m down the road to a roundabout to loop back and go the way they wanted.
Good luck OP as the way you have described it he was in the wrongSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
-
^ Yes I raised that thread there but thought I’d get some advice on here too more specifically from an insurance/legal point of view.0
-
OP are you allowed to discus an open court case??? A random roundabout would have suffice, now we have the exact round about and the case details.
If the other party finds this will you be in trouble? probably best to check with your solicitor"It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP0 -
Not sure tbh. I haven’t disclosed any names or companies involved.
Plus anything said on this thread would have no bearing on the case. My solicitor and insurer are under my instruction and I would seek proper independent legal advice if I needed to make a decision that could influence proceedings.0 -
Also what difference is there from discussing it on here as opposed to discussing with friends, family, colleagues etc. ?0
-
OP are you allowed to discus an open court case??? A random roundabout would have suffice, now we have the exact round about and the case details.
If the other party finds this will you be in trouble? probably best to check with your solicitor
It's not a criminal trial where a jury might be influenced, it's a civil case of liability between insurers on behalf of their client.Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards