We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Faulty goods - seller refusing to refund/replace
thatsmeallover
Posts: 3 Newbie
Hi everyone,
Hoping I can trouble you for some advice.
I bought a replacement macbook screen off ebay 4 months ago and it's now gone faulty. The item was listed as "brand NEW"
I've contacted the seller for a replacement and have been told that it was sold with a 3 month warranty (I've checked the listing and it does say this, but I didn't notice it when I bought it.)
Here's where I need your help: Am I right in thinking that the seller should still replace this as it's become faulty within 6 months, because it was listed as new? I'm working on the assumption that just because he says '3 month warranty' it doesn't allow him to circumvent consumer rights legislation.
I've quoted the sale of goods act to him, stating that it is defective/not fit for purpose having developed a fault within 6 months (took a quote directly from the MSE pages), but he just keeps quoting the 3 months warranty.
I just want to clarify that I'm on the right lines with this as I feel the next step is a letter with 14 days to rectify this, then small claims court if he fails to deal with it.
Note: the seller is a Ltd company.
Thanks in advance for any help you can give.
Hoping I can trouble you for some advice.
I bought a replacement macbook screen off ebay 4 months ago and it's now gone faulty. The item was listed as "brand NEW"
I've contacted the seller for a replacement and have been told that it was sold with a 3 month warranty (I've checked the listing and it does say this, but I didn't notice it when I bought it.)
Here's where I need your help: Am I right in thinking that the seller should still replace this as it's become faulty within 6 months, because it was listed as new? I'm working on the assumption that just because he says '3 month warranty' it doesn't allow him to circumvent consumer rights legislation.
I've quoted the sale of goods act to him, stating that it is defective/not fit for purpose having developed a fault within 6 months (took a quote directly from the MSE pages), but he just keeps quoting the 3 months warranty.
I just want to clarify that I'm on the right lines with this as I feel the next step is a letter with 14 days to rectify this, then small claims court if he fails to deal with it.
Note: the seller is a Ltd company.
Thanks in advance for any help you can give.
0
Comments
-
Is the seller a business seller or a private seller? (The distinction is important).
If a business seller then you have your normal consumer rights, including the right for a repair, replacement or refund (full, as it is less than 6 months from purchase).
If a private seller then you're up a creek without a paddle.
Sorry - just re-read and notice you say Ltd Company.0 -
Sale of Goods Act was replaced in 2015 by the Consumer Rights ActIf you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0
-
Thanks for the help so far. So I'd be correct in placing my claim for a replacement/refund on the fact that it was advertised as new, and forget that he stated 3 months warranty?0
-
Where are they based, what's the return address?Note: the seller is a Ltd company0 -
No it wasn't, Distance selling regulations were replaced by the CRA. The sale of goods act is still alive and well.lincroft1710 wrote: »Sale of Goods Act was replaced in 2015 by the Consumer Rights Act0 -
No it wasn't, Distance selling regulations were replaced by the CRA. The sale of goods act is still alive and well.
No the distance selling regulations (DSR) were replaced by the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (CCR)
The Sale of goods act (SOGA) was superseeded (not replaced) by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA)0 -
No the distance selling regulations (DSR) were replaced by the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (CCR
The Sale of goods act (SOGA) was superseeded (not replaced) by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA)
https://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/regulation/consumer-rights-act
The Consumer Rights Act 2015
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 became law on 1 October 2015, replacing three major pieces of consumer legislation - the Sale of Goods Act, Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations, and the Supply of Goods and Services Act. It was introduced to simplify, strengthen and modernise the law, giving you clearer shopping rights.
The above site gives information about returning faulty goods under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.0 -
OP, whilst the others squabble, the most pertinent question is, where is the seller based?0
-
A bit of a simplification by Which.https://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/regulation/consumer-rights-act
The Consumer Rights Act 2015
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 became law on 1 October 2015, replacing three major pieces of consumer legislation - the Sale of Goods Act, Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations, and the Supply of Goods and Services Act. It was introduced to simplify, strengthen and modernise the law, giving you clearer shopping rights.
The above site gives information about returning faulty goods under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
The majority of SOGA have been superseded by the CRA but the act itself has not been replaced. The Act still applies to contracts before 2015 and for business contracts.0 -
FWIW, the Consumer Rights Act actually gives a explanation on its impact on existing legislation:Sale of Goods Act 1979
For business to consumer contracts this will mainly be replaced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 but some provisions of SGA will still apply, for example, rules which are applicable to all contracts of sale of goods (as defined by that Act – essentially these are sales of goods for money), regarding matters such as when property in goods passes. The SGA will still apply to business to business contracts and to consumer to consumer contracts.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
