We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Am I giving away more by appealing PCN online?
SidneyS
Posts: 5 Forumite
Dear all,
I hope you'll forgive me asking this question (I have read the newbies post and made a search of the forum) but I wanted the advice of more experienced members.
My understanding is that the initial appeal (due to say ParkingEye 'golden ticket' issued more than a month after the ANPR) is practically just to get the appeal number, which is hopefully a subsequent certain win.
I've read advice to just do this online (take a screenshot also). But is this not giving them an advantage since you're going through their process. For example you're agreeing to certain terms and conditions that you wouldn't need to via your own recorded letter and the real low blow is 'driver' is included in their drop down box. Not a trap many might fall into but nonetheless an example of how they do have a home advantage?
I suspect I'm being over cautious but advice from experience members would be welcome.
Many thanks
Sid
I hope you'll forgive me asking this question (I have read the newbies post and made a search of the forum) but I wanted the advice of more experienced members.
My understanding is that the initial appeal (due to say ParkingEye 'golden ticket' issued more than a month after the ANPR) is practically just to get the appeal number, which is hopefully a subsequent certain win.
I've read advice to just do this online (take a screenshot also). But is this not giving them an advantage since you're going through their process. For example you're agreeing to certain terms and conditions that you wouldn't need to via your own recorded letter and the real low blow is 'driver' is included in their drop down box. Not a trap many might fall into but nonetheless an example of how they do have a home advantage?
I suspect I'm being over cautious but advice from experience members would be welcome.
Many thanks
Sid
0
Comments
-
When there is a likelihood of matters ending up in court, I always prefer to write a letter.
This is an entirely unregulated industry which is scamming the public with inflated claims for minor breaches of alleged contracts for alleged parking offences, aided and abetted by a handful of low-rent solicitors.
Parking Eye, CPM, Smart, and others have already been named and shamed in the House of Commons as have Gladstones Solicitors, and BW Legal, (these two law firms take hundreds of these cases to court each week, hospital car parks and residential complex tickets have been especially mentioned. They lose most of them, and have been reported to the regulatory authority by an M.P. for unprofessional conduct
The problem has become so widespread that MPs have agreed to enact a Bill to regulate these scammers. It has even been suggested that some of these companies have links with organised crime.
Watch the video of the Second Reading and committee stage in the House of Commons recently. MPs have a very low opinion of this industry.
http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/2f0384f2-eba5-4fff-ab07-cf24b6a22918?in=12:49:41
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-07-19/debates/2b90805c-bff8-4707-8bdc-b0bfae5a7ad5/Parking(CodeOfPractice)Bill(FirstSitting)
and complain in the most robust terms to your MP. With a fair wind they will be out of business by in the not too distant future.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
1. Are you aware that some PPCs refuse to sign for 'Recorded Delivery'?
2. Are you aware that if you use a method of appeal not following the PPC's approved procedure, they will likely ignore what you've sent, they'll time you out and you'll never get a POPLA Code?
3. Are you aware of how many letters are (apparently) never received by PPCs?Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Advice here is never reveal who was driving and send appeals online if you have that option0
-
Thanks for all your timely replies- on balance it looks like cautiously appealing online is the way I'll go.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
