After exchange of contracts

badger09

badger09 wrote: »

A cursory look at OP's responses on several other threads had me :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

google translate ain't what it used to be;)

I'm calling :spam: but will wait a short while so others can also have a chuckle

Apologies to OP for veering even more off topic, but thought I'd share

This is a post by trailingspouse yesterday
"On a separate post, a couple of weeks ago, someone was criticised for asking what the score would be financially if he (hypothetically) married and then divorced. He was shot down in flames for being unromantic.
But I made the point on that thread, and I'll make it again here - real life is not like a Disney movie. We all need to get much more clued-up about precisely how being married will affect us financially, and have those conversations with the people we want to share our life with.
I think you, OP, have had that conversation, and the two of you are being very straightforward with each other about wanting to retain your financial independence. Unfortunately the system isn't set up to cope with it"

This is
gamemodapk's version shortly afterwards
"On a different post, a little while prior, somebody was reprimanded for asking what the score would be fiscally on the off chance that he (theoretically) wedded and afterwards separated. He was shot down on fire for being unromantic. However, I made the point on that string, and I'll make it again here - genuine isn't care for a Disney motion picture. We as a whole need to get considerably more enlightened up about correctly how being hitched will influence us monetarily and have those discussions with the general population we need to impart our life too. I think you, OP, have had that discussion, and you two are by and large extremely clear with one another about needing to hold your money related freedom. Sadly the framework isn't set up to adapt to it".


:T