Late NTK (ANPR) from VCS/Excel (IPC)

Coupon-mad

VCS are claiming keeper liability based on law of agency.

...think I have enough to win the case based on the case of Smith and Quayle already refuting law of agency.

Or calling out the lack of Rights of Audience of Mr Wilkes (or whichever rep rocks up) as a first step, as you seem up for all possible arguments?

Discussed here along with a link to another thread where Excel v Smith and/or VCS v Quayle were used to kill off any silly attempt at the law of agency against a consumer (not applicable - a member of your family doesn't use your car 'on your behalf' if one day they happen to drive a car you happen to be the rk of, as you know!):

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/75754784#Comment_75754784

HTH - and don't forget to email a costs schedule nearer the time to court & VCS.