We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mortgage, PPI, Endowment - Bereavement

Hello
I am new to the forum and have a query that I hope someone can help me with. I have been dealing with Nationwide in relation to a mortgage that my late husband had with them, initially Portman Building Society. My husband passed away in 2012 so I am dealing with this via grant of probate through a third party although I am the sole beneficiary of my husband's estate.
Nationwide have agreed that they sold us PPI for our mortgage and have stated they will refund the commission element of the PPI and have written to my third party with a cheque.
However we paid two mortgages, initial and a top up when we moved. We also paid around £70 a month on top of the mortgage to a separate body, namely Pinnacle Finance, this may have been the PPI element.
We tried to port our mortgage to another lender but the PPI insurance policy could not be moved , we asked Pinnacle direct if we could move it and they said no.

We did make one claim on the PPI for a short spell of unemployment, the policy did pay out when my husband passed away in 2012.

Not having any paperwork with regards to the Mortgage or PPI I cant look back to check the circumstances but Nationwide state it was not compulsory at the time and that my husband was fully aware of the PPI addition to the mortgage. Should I just accept that they are telling me on the basis that the policy did pay out?

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    the policy did pay out when my husband passed away in 2012.
    It won't have been PPI that paid out on death, that would be Life Insurance.
  • Nearlyold
    Nearlyold Posts: 2,401 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 5 November 2018 at 5:35PM
    What basis do you have to disbelieve what Nationwide are telling you. If you claimed on the policy in respect of unemployment then your husband must have known he had the policy and if Nationwide say it wasn't compulsory at the time why would you think otherwise? NB It would only matter anyway if your husband was told it was compulsory when it wasn't.


    Presumably you mean the Endowment policy paid out when your husband sadly passed away?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,402 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Nationwide have agreed that they sold us PPI for our mortgage and have stated they will refund the commission element of the PPI and have written to my third party with a cheque.

    This means your PPI complaint failed.
    However we paid two mortgages, initial and a top up when we moved. We also paid around £70 a month on top of the mortgage to a separate body, namely Pinnacle Finance, this may have been the PPI element.

    Pinnacle were a provider of PPI.
    We tried to port our mortgage to another lender but the PPI insurance policy could not be moved , we asked Pinnacle direct if we could move it and they said no.

    That is often the case with lender's own-brand PPI.
    We did make one claim on the PPI for a short spell of unemployment, the policy did pay out when my husband passed away in 2012.

    PPI does not pay out on death. The life assurance policy would have paid out on death. The PPi would have paid out on the unemployment period. This is possibly one of the reasons the PPI complaint failed (as it clearly shows it was a) needed b) known about and c) eligible.
    Nationwide state it was not compulsory at the time and that my husband was fully aware of the PPI addition to the mortgage.

    Given the claim, it is pretty much a given that it was known about. Any allegation to the contrary would be false.
    Should I just accept that they are telling me on the basis that the policy did pay out?

    Why would you not accept it? I am struggling to see an issue here.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Thank you for all the comments, I think I just needed clarification
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.