We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Saving for a house deposit - best savings route?

2»

Comments

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 28,031 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Is this some sort of guarantor mortgage? In which case she could potentially be released from the mortgage if the LTV is now lower than it was, or the account has been in good standing for a period of time. Although if that's the case, she would have had to pledge additional funds/assets in guarantee, which doesn't seem to fit the situation.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,988 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My partner is on a mortgage with her parents (for where we currently live) so unfortunately is not a first time buyer.
    You might want to revisit this assumption. From your later posts it seems that your partner has no beneficial interest in the property and so, despite being "on the mortgage" might still be a first time buyer for SDLT purposes.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Is this some sort of guarantor mortgage? In which case she could potentially be released from the mortgage if the LTV is now lower than it was, or the account has been in good standing for a period of time. Although if that's the case, she would have had to pledge additional funds/assets in guarantee, which doesn't seem to fit the situation.

    This all seems rather odd.

    It is possible to get a sole proprietor /joint mortgagee arrangement - you see this where a young person wants to buy but doesn't have the income to support the mortgage - the parent doesn't want to be named as an owner (and end up with extra stamp duty/CGT considerations) so the offspring is sole proprietor with the parent sharing the liability for the mortgage but having no ownership.


    It seems that despite his partner's parents having paid the deposit and apparently having enough income to support the repayments, the partner was required for "affordability".

    If the partner is not named as an owner of the property, is she still a first time buyer?

    And is she in fact paying her father rent?
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    And is she eligible for a LISA for the house purchase?
  • Thanks all!

    Checked with the inlaws - my partner IS on the deeds


    Frustrating but thankful we are in a situation to save.

    If anyone has any input on my savings plan please let me know!

    Cheers!
  • xylophone wrote: »
    And is she eligible for a LISA for the house purchase?

    Based on my last post, it would seem not.
  • twotonealex
    twotonealex Posts: 72 Forumite
    edited 3 November 2018 at 7:20PM
    I appreciate the potential arguments that could be put forwards for her not being an 'owner' but in this case, but the pros of her parents subsidising our living/saving (by our small contribution to the mortgage) outweigh any additional funds we would have saved by her being a FTB.

    Thanks all
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If she is an owner and in fact is contributing to the mortgage by paying over money to the father to enable him to pay the mortgage, then she is entitled to a share of the equity?

    And this is her PPR - if it is sold when you are going to move out then there is no CGT on her share?

    And if it is not sold and you are buying a house together then there will be extra SDLT to pay?

    I think that you should be taking advice as to the ramifications of this arrangement.
  • xylophone wrote: »
    If she is an owner and in fact is contributing to the mortgage by paying over money to the father to enable him to pay the mortgage, then she is entitled to a share of the equity?

    And this is her PPR - if it is sold when you are going to move out then there is no CGT on her share?

    And if it is not sold and you are buying a house together then there will be extra SDLT to pay?

    I think that you should be taking advice as to the ramifications of this arrangement.

    I will make sure this is discussed.

    Thanks for your help!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.