We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

IHT & split Land Registry

13»

Comments

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Until you have the time line, order of events and transaction type investigating the tax details of things that may not apply could be a waste of time.
  • There are things(like a life interest and transferable nil rate band) that can change the tax position.

    Back in 2005/6 the typical approach was to offload assets up to the nil rate band as it was not transferable then.


    To go forward selling the house they need the death certificate for the brother and the mothers grant, can't see any reason for that to not go ahead.

    Unwinding the tax position can be done separately, that delays winding up the mothers estate as the cash needs to be kept in the the estate in case there are bills to pay.

    executor/administrator probate/administration are often use generically

    I suspect OP means the other brother was administrator for the deceased brother intestate estate, either by the mother(first in line) stepping aside or POA.

    Lets hope this brother has kept records.

    Your last point is correct.

    I have also come across the term ‘Gift with Reservaion of Benefit’ (GROB). This seems to be the closest thing to what appears to have happened. A tapered IHT would then exist - starting in 2005.The estate may incur 16% IHT (on my bros share for the 5 yrs that elapsed until his death), or it could be free of IHT as my mother (donor) lived for more than the 7 yrs.

    The only abnormality being my brother (recipient) died before my mother (donor).

    Has anyone had experience of GROB?
  • Big_Dipper wrote: »
    Your last point is correct.

    I have also come across the term ‘Gift with Reservaion of Benefit’ (GROB). This seems to be the closest thing to what appears to have happened. A tapered IHT would then exist - starting in 2005.The estate may incur 16% IHT (on my bros share for the 5 yrs that elapsed until his death), or it could be free of IHT as my mother (donor) lived for more than the 7 yrs.

    The only abnormality being my brother (recipient) died before my mother (donor).

    Has anyone had experience of GROB?
    I refer you to my reply #2 that still applies.
  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    Big_Dipper wrote: »
    I have also come across the term ‘Gift with Reservaion of Benefit’ (GROB). This seems to be the closest thing to what appears to have happened. A tapered IHT would then exist - starting in 2005.The estate may incur 16% IHT (on my bros share for the 5 yrs that elapsed until his death), or it could be free of IHT as my mother (donor) lived for more than the 7 yrs.

    The only abnormality being my brother (recipient) died before my mother (donor).

    Has anyone had experience of GROB?


    [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The Gift with Reservation of Benefit rules prevent the 7 yr gift rule being applied not allow it.[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The rule says that the gift should still be treated as part of the death estate even if given away 10yrs ago. But I expect you included the full value of the house in your mother's estate so you have included what was previously gifted to you brother.[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Re the tapering percentage over the 7rs, were this to apply which it does not, it is only gifts over the Nil Rate Band of £325k which are tapered so the 1st £325k of gifts can still be taxed at 40% if the death estate itself is already over £325k[/FONT]
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.