Advice on Evidence - Letter of Claim

pademo

Point taken.

pademo

nosferatu1001 wrote: »

Send them a copy of the letter you ACTUALLY received, and a copy of the fake, and highlight the differences. Invite their Solicitor(?) (I presume sol at this point) to explain why you shouldnt refer them to the SRA for a breach of the code of conduct.

I am wondering whether it would be better NOT to include any copies but just refer

to the anomalies? Make them have to work and dig out the relevant paperwork?

nosferatu1001

No. Send them both. Then you can truthfully tell whoever you need to, that they could have NO DOUBT that they sent a fake.

pademo

Ok, thanks. It also shows clearly this 2016 letter is supposedly from an address of the office they didn't have until 2017...?


That's the letter done and I will get it in the post. It will be interesting to see what happens. I suspect some weasel response.



I've also called my MP's office and I'm writing and setting up a meeting.


While researching, I noticed a sentence in their report & accounts which claims - BW Legal has genuinely managed to create an offering which preserves the principle of "treating customers (read debtors) fairly". I call bull.

pademo

Does anyone have a view on whether I should delay the response to spread out the hassle? I "officially" have the 30 days until around 9th November.

nosferatu1001

No, it makes no odds. Youre not near a time out.

The_Deep

Have you watched the video?

This is an entirely unregulated industry which is scamming the public with inflated claims for minor breaches of contracts for alleged parking offences, aided and abetted by a handful of low-rent solicitors.

Parking Eye, CPM, Smart, and another company have already been named and shamed, as has Gladstones Solicitors, and BW Legal, (these two law firms take hundreds of these cases to court Hospital car parks and residential complex tickets have been especially mentioned.

The problem has become so rampant that MPs have agreed to enact a Bill to regulate these scammers. Watch the video of the Second Reading in the House of Commons recently

http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/2f0384f2-eba5-4fff-ab07-cf24b6a22918?in=12:49:41 recently.

and complain in the most robust terms to your MP. With a fair wind they will be out of business by Christmas.
each year). They lose most of them, and have been reported to the regulatory authority by an M.P. for unprofessional conduct