We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Land and responsibilities
Comments
-
The said Transfer also contains the following covenants by the
Transferor
THE Company hereby covenants with the Board as follows:-
(a) To keep the Easement Land forever hereafter open and unbuilt upon
(b) Not to substantially alter the level of the Easement Land from
that existing at the date hereof
Am I reading it correctly... I can't be built on?
There may of course have been other good reasons for the previous developer not building there!0 -
Thanks for the replies.
My main concern that the land could be built on. I've had a quick look through the Property Register most of which is double dutch to me: )
The bit which caught my eye is as follows:
The said Transfer also contains the following covenants by the
Transferor
THE Company hereby covenants with the Board as follows:-
(a) To keep the Easement Land forever hereafter open and unbuilt upon
(b) Not to substantially alter the level of the Easement Land from
that existing at the date hereof
Am I reading it correctly... I can't be built on?
That doesn't mean that it CAN'T be built on. That carries little-to-no weight with the planning authorities. It may well be that the "easement land" is not the whole site, anyway.
The beneficiary of that covenant can have a right good ol' whinge if the "easement land" is built on, though, if they still exist and if they ever found out about it. I suspect there would be compensation payable, but I very much doubt it'd stop them being built.
If you want to ensure it's not built on, you need to ensure it's in ownership that you trust never to succumb to a big pile of cash.
If it IS the RoW, then the RoW itself would have to remain anyway. Even re-routing an RoW (say, from diagonally to round the edge) is a pain in the backside.0 -
To me - I am reading it as the whole of the land is safe (bar the local Council trying to pull a fast one and somehow getting away with it - as per post from earlier poster).
EDIT; Might be an idea to contact local Ramblers Association and check out their attitude to this.0 -
Easement land can include areas designated as open access land.0
-
I saw a discussion here, or perhaps somewhere else about covenants that basically stated to be enforecable a covenant has to be to the benefit of some "land" A covenant that says without permission of "Mr Smith" without being attached to a parcel of land can be ruled unenforceable.
I would go to the auction. If you get it for a song, then I would extend my garden a bit by taking some of the park, and keep the rest as it is. As long as you buy public liability insurance for it, there should not be any problems for you.
If it is a true wildlife habitat look at gifting it to a well know appropriate charity, with a no building covenant.0 -
If it is a true wildlife habitat look at gifting it to a well know appropriate charity,
Most wildlife conservation charities don't want areas like this. Too small and also they have higher priorities for their limited management resources. There are other smaller and local groups who might be interested depending on where it is. The usual advice is to form a community group.0 -
Many thanks for the replies, definitely food for thought!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards