Yet Another Markham Retail Park Driver Left Site PCN

StaffsSW

The_Slithy_Tove wrote: »

Now if everyone who has ever parked there in the last 2 years makes a SAR to them, and then questions why their data is being held for no reason, that could make life difficult for them. PPCs have no reason to keep details of cars which have stayed within the allowed parking period; they should surely be deleted immediately.

If SARs could be requested by limited companies, I could tie them up for months with bureaucracy with the amount I've dealt with!

abedegno

I've had no comments on my Popla appeal, so I'm guessing it's okay.

From what StaffsSW says it doesn't sound like I try to hard on appeal and PPL will likely fold.

Will be submitting later today, so wish me luck!

StaffsSW

abedegno wrote: »

I've had no comments on my Popla appeal, so I'm guessing it's okay.

From what StaffsSW says it doesn't sound like I try to hard on appeal and PPL will likely fold.

Will be submitting later today, so wish me luck!

I leave commenting on the wordy POPLA appeals to those more familiar with them than myself. My circumstances are slightly different in that all of the vehicles I deal with are registered to Limited companies, and I don't often partake in POPLA appeals these days. If our attempts to transfer liability are rejected by the PPC, I simply reply with a couple of reasons why they are wrong, and invite them to discuss it in front of a judge. Very few take us up on that offer, and for the few that have I know I had the support of the directors to fight them.

The POPLA appeals I have done for that site relate to staff vehicles where the drivers wants a bit more of a "belt and braces" method of making sure it doesn't come back on them. Requesting that the PPC provide strict proof that the driver left the site is an almost impossible task for them. If they can't prove the driver left the site, then there is no chance of them proving a breach.

abedegno

Popla appeal submitted.

I added another appeal point, as following the SAR the information provided by PPL their own records showed an entry time of 12:25, an NTK contravention time of 12:32 and the photographic evidence of 12:33 - so within grace period time. Goes to show it's worth submitting a SAR as it can reveal potentially useful information to use in appeal.

I guess I sit tight, and wait now for a response.

abedegno

So looks like Premier Park timed out today on responding to my appeal and have decided not to contest it - just won my first Popla appeal, so excited :-)

StaffsSW

It's pleasing to hear that - if you are local, email a summary to Toby Perkins MP to let him know that nothing has changed, and his constituents are still being pestered and harassed by this shower of scutters

Chezzy170

See my other posts re this
I am now up to the £170 fine stage as Premier Parks sell it on!
Good luck

KeithP

Chezzy170, they have not 'sold it on'.

Please stop spamming the boards.

Chezzy170

Have a look at this, good luck

Parking cowboys/ debt collectors web site
Can't send the link it's not allowed

Umkomaas

Chezzy170 wrote: »

Have a look at this, good luck

Parking cowboys/ debt collectors web site
Can't send the link it's not allowed

Pay attention to what KeithP has told you earlier today!

This is dead thread, all done and dusted and not in need of your ‘sage’ advice.

Is there nothing on your telly to watch?