CCJ Compensation

twhitehousescat

!!! wrote: »

Right.

So you didn't update your V5 docs for where the vehicle was registered, which is also an offence.

I don't think that will stand up in court very well either.

This happened because the courts issued the CCJ to the address of the vehicle was registered, then the collection agencies chased you down via info on the CRA's

no , the claimant is supposed to use the lask KNOWN address , this can easily be different to that stated on the V5

last known , not dvla address

twhitehousescat

twhitehousescat wrote: »

no , the claimant is supposed to use the lask KNOWN address** , this can easily be different to that stated on the V5

last known , not dvla address

**

after communication has clearly stated it

[Deleted User]

It has plenty to do with it.

Please stop trying to dodge around the point.

OP was also contacted at his known listed addresses and still failed to respond

twhitehousescat

!!! wrote: »

It has plenty to do with it.

Please stop trying to dodge around the point.

OP was also contacted at his known listed addresses and still failed to respond

if he failed to reply , then that was not a known address , letters went to his perents house and were answered , therefore that was the last KNOWN address , but yet they sent paperwork elsewhere , knowing that that address had not been verified

Samsung_Note2

!!! wrote: »

It has plenty to do with it.

Please stop trying to dodge around the point.

OP was also contacted at his known listed addresses and still failed to respond

Ahh changing the goal posts there Gary lad....:rotfl: