We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
DWP Investigations
Comments
-
Lots of unanswered questions. If the OP thinks we are being tough critics he has a major wake up call ahead.
Who made the current claim?
Who acted on behalf of your father?
How long has the house been in his name?
Was it joint ownership or tenants in common?
Why was the benefit used after the initial contact with DWP?
Yes, there may have been systemic failings on the part of DWP to come back to you to stop the benefits, but you knew there was a major issue and so the benefits should have remained uncashed or annexed for safekeeping. There should be a lump sum waiting to be repaid.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards