We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Demand before Court Action - Pollock Fairbridge and Schiavone
Comments
-
Hi
my partner just received a letter from the same solicitors - he’s Glasgow taxi driver picked up passengers at Edin airport in drop off (which he has always done). He did send an email to VCS (the parking people at Edin airport) but they said he still had to pay. Now 4 months later the letter from the Solictiors has arrived. What do you suggest he does? Thanks0 -
That extra £60 is almost certainly unlawful, read this,
Excel v Wilkinson
At the Bradford County Court, District Judge Claire Jackson (now HHJ Jackson, a Specialist Civil Circuit Judge) decided to hear a 'test case' a few months ago, where £60 had been added to a parking charge despite Judges up and down the country repeatedly disallowing that sum and warning parking firms not to waste court time with such spurious claims. That case was Excel v Wilkinson: G4QZ465V, heard in July 2020 and leave to appeal was refused and that route was not pursued. The Judge concluded that such claims are proceedings with 'an improper collateral purpose'. This Judge - and others who have since copied her words and struck dozens of cases out in late 2020 and into 2021 - went into significant detail and concluded that parking operators (such as this Claimant) are seeking to circumvent CPR 27.14 as well as breaching the Consumer Rights Act 2015. DJ Hickinbottom has recently struck more cases out in that court area, stating: ''I find that striking out this claim is the only appropriate manner in which the disapproval of the court can be shown''.
and copy the correspondence to the SRA, it is time they put a stop to this deception by these bargain basement law firms.
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/instructing/your-right-to-complain/
You never know how far you can go until you go too far.1 -
I suggest you start your own thread.1
-
Please read the newbies before doing so.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.1
-
I see that @Halley_11 has now started a thread, this one can be allowed to drop off the bottom of the page.4
-
What he saysYou never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
He has been banned again, the third time since December.
It is rather a pity in a way because, apart from his obsession with me, he posts some helpful stuff. I am sure that he will be back.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
