Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Will there really be a crash?

191012141542

Comments

  • POPPYOSCAR
    POPPYOSCAR Posts: 14,902 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Property may be a market, but it's certainly not a free market.
    It's completely manipulated by the govt, via the planning system.

    You don't own a property you have a mortgage on.

    Err yes you do, legally as per your records held with Land Registry.

    A mortgage is simply a loan against that property.
  • scd3scd4
    scd3scd4 Posts: 1,180 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary
    edited 19 September 2018 at 10:16PM
    Sapphire wrote: »
    People (even wealthy ones) used to rent much more than they do now, and still do in other countries. In no way were they considered failures, at least not based on whether they rented or owned properties.

    However, the system has become skewed in this country, due to property now being considered a 'market', which should never have been allowed to happen; homes should be places to live in, not to speculate on.

    Advertising has plastered itself in gullible people's imaginations, giving them the impression that they are somehow better people if they own a property, which is nonsense. Someone above is even of the impression that you become 'upper middle class' when you own a property, which is also patent nonsense.


    Who would care what a stranger thinks of them and what class they are in.


    My mortgage is nearly paid for at 51, we put our daughter through Uni with no debt. Drive nice cars and have lovely holidays. I am happy to be working class, I really could not care less.
  • scd3scd4
    scd3scd4 Posts: 1,180 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary
    Property may be a market, but it's certainly not a free market.
    It's completely manipulated by the govt, via the planning system.

    You don't own a property you have a mortgage on.


    No, my mum has ownership of her £350 000 flat for the last 10 years.
  • This is such an interesting thread. I'm reading it while watching Edie.
  • Bears like you never seem to realise that having some debt is not necessarily a bad thing, in fact, it can be a beneficial. For example we are approaching 10 years of low interest rates. For those 10 years, if I had wanted to, I could have paid off my mortgages, for which the rate is marginally over 1%. But the return on my equities (for which the total investment far exceeds the value of my mortgages) dividend income over that period, exceeds 3.5% (currently around 4%). Therefore it really is a 'no brainer' to retain the debt.

    That might change however, when I sell one or two of my properties in the near future, because IMO it wouldn't be so wise to invest more into the stock market at my age (60). I will invest the equity into safer assets, probably single corporate bonds held to maturity.

    Lovely. We have 3 businesses but I'm more interested in why people think they are superior when they own property, when lots of people don't actually really own it.
  • Crashy_Time
    Crashy_Time Posts: 13,386 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    scd3scd4 wrote: »
    No, my mum has ownership of her £350 000 flat for the last 10 years.


    Why doesn`t she just stop paying the mortgage then?
  • scd3scd4
    scd3scd4 Posts: 1,180 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary
    edited 19 September 2018 at 10:30PM
    Lovely. We have 3 businesses but I'm more interested in why people think they are superior when they own property, when lots of people don't actually really own it.




    Renters own nothing and after 20,30 years..................... still own nothing. I know which one I would rather be.
  • I'm still not sure why owners think they are more successful than renters. I'm bemused by the amount of homeowners who take out massive loans for stupid cars. There's a new estate by us full of tiny four bed houses and sitting in the drive are brand new shiny 4x4s, presumably on the never never, Debt debt and more debt. Makes the money saved on buying a house pale into insignificance.

    Are you a renter or owner? I am an owner of multiple occupancy properties throughout London and the UK, yet I drive a very modest car - you would not tell that I am a multi-millionaire.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Are you a renter or owner? I am an owner of multiple occupancy properties throughout London and the UK, yet I drive a very modest car - you would not tell that I am a multi-millionaire.

    Ditto (although our properties are not multiple occupation), our car is an 11 year old zafira, worth less than £1k, I don't feel the need to buy another car yet, as it is extremely reliable.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Lovely. We have 3 businesses but I'm more interested in why people think they are superior when they own property, when lots of people don't actually really own it.

    Profitability (money) doesn't make anyone superior, it simply buys things, that's all. Although it does also provide financial security, which is important, and to that end, it isn't the number of businesses that you own that is important, it is the profitability, and the input required (not much use being cash rich and time poor, at the end of the day, time is worth more, we will all run out of time). But the point that I was making was that all debt is not necessarily bad.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.