We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Challenging an Ombudsman
Comments
-
I think the complaint has to be about not following procedures and guidelines. And I suspect it will fail if OP did not submit evidence in a timely fashion, even if that evidence would have supported the case.0
-
Jane_Mortimer wrote: »Reading Tim.
My lease says I have to yield up the property in the same condition as I found it. The Ombudsman is quoting from I don’t know where saying that the property had to be left in a lettable condition ready for a new tenant to move in. This isn’t his interpretation of the lease he is quoting. The trouble is nowhere in my lease does it have the clauses he is quoting and it makes a big difference.
I’m sorry folks going to have to end it here - hands can’t keep up but I have the information I need thank you.
That would be a very unusual clause in a commercial lease, I assume it is commercial as you mentioned dilapidations. Repairing covenants in a commercial lease are completely different from residential ones and the repairing obligations are very onerous.
Unless there is a detailed schedule of condition that is documented in the main lease and the repairing covenants are amended accordingly then a tenants repairing obligations include all existing disrepair. Generally a commercial property does have to be returned in a lettable condition even if it was a complete wreck at the start of the lease.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards