We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Scotland rental query

2»

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 September 2018 at 9:42AM
    rich3245 wrote: »
    It is a shame that the detail in Schedule 3 is not more detailed as it seems very open to interpretation - Is a holiday let 'a home'? That is clearly subjective
    I don't think it's subjective. It's not a term defined by the Act so it would be given its normal definition - and I don't think that a place you stay for a week or so while on holiday comes under most people's interpretation of "being provided with a home".
    Is there no other legal agreement that we could enter in to, for example, go ahead with a PRT but with a covenant that we will terminate after 12 months?
    Like I said above, what would be the point of allowing a route for landlords to bypass the Act? Surely they'd all do it?

    Section 44 is quite clear: "A tenancy...may not be brought to an end by the landlord, the tenant, nor by any agreement between them, except in accordance with this Part."
  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Ok you can't let out a holiday home for 12 months in sScotland, it will be seen as a PRT no doubt about it.


    Not only that it would very easy to convince (in fact they wouldn't need convincing) the First tier tribunal that this was an excuse to try and circumvent the law.


    If they do give you some made up tenancy then it wouldn't be valid, not only that but without a proper PRT they would declare no tenancy even exists and in that situation it would be almost impossible to get you out.


    So no it's a PRT or nothing for you a PRT gives you serious protection from eviction unless a statutory ground is met.


    Believe me as a Scottish LL I have had the unenviable position of sitting in front of the first tier tribunal, they think only of the Tenant and will find any excuse to let them stay.


    Lucky for me I still had an old SAT with 7 months rent arrears ( that's how long it took) which the tenant had no defence against.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.