We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fish allowed in my rental? Confusing legal wording.
Options
Comments
-
Adereterial wrote: »There’s nothing unclear about that clause.
You can’t have pets. Fish in a tank a pets. You also can’t hve any other animals - which excludes any other type of non-pet animal - livestock, service animals, guard animals etc. Excluding service animals may be a breach of the Equality Act but that a subject for a different debate.
Yes, that is clear to me. It is then listing rodents, reptiles and birds as if those are NOT animals that had me confused. Why would fish come under pets/animals but rodents (like a hamster) wouldn't?0 -
Is there enough room in your plaice for one?Gather ye rosebuds while ye may0
-
It's a load of pollacksNo.79 save £12k in 2020. Total end May £11610
Annual target £240000 -
If they allowed a fish it could be the fin edge of the wedgeGather ye rosebuds while ye may0
-
mightymooses wrote: »Yes, that is clear to me. It is then listing rodents, reptiles and birds as if those are NOT animals that had me confused. Why would fish come under pets/animals but rodents (like a hamster) wouldn't?0
-
Norman_Castle wrote: »Possibly the result of previous disputes with residents arguing their pets aren't pets. Expect fish to be added to the list when they find yours.0
-
I suspect it's either been drafted by someone stupid enough to think "animal" = "mammal", or in anticipation of having to deal with people that stupid. So it's possible they've deliberately left fish out as being less objectionable than your neighbour's albatross / snake / rats.0
-
mightymooses wrote: »That's more what I suspected. I don't think I'd be brave (or foolish!) enough to actually sneak a tank in, I was more trying to see whether there was reasonable grounds to suspect there was actually any point asking (i.e. there'd be no point calling and asking to have a dog so you just wouldn't bother).
Have you actually got a fish tank?0 -
Fish or any other pet not allowed. But no judge would evict you for that little breach.
Trouble is, thanks to Thatcher's 1988 housing act a landlord can evict you for no reason at all.0 -
The fireman put his foot through my ceiling and it was like that for ages.
Not too long one hopes...for the fireman's sake!:)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards