Charged for Cashback

Last night I was charged 50p for cashback with a purchase. I thought all card usage charges for the consumer had made illegal.
Do you want your money back, and a bit more, search for 'money claim online' - They don't like it up 'em Captain Mainwaring
«1

Comments

  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 36,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Surcharges applicable to specific payment methods were outlawed earlier this year, but I wouldn't have thought that this prevented a merchant from charging for cashback, in much the same way that some ATMs charge for withdrawals....
  • EarthBoy
    EarthBoy Posts: 3,177 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They have, but the charge wasn't for using your card, it was for the cashback and I don't know of any regulations forbidding charges for cashback. If you'd used your card and not requested any cashback there shouldn't have been a charge.
  • Shakin_Steve
    Shakin_Steve Posts: 2,811 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    New one on me. Never heard of being charged for cashback.
    I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.
  • ~Beanie~
    ~Beanie~ Posts: 3,043 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Lucky it was only 50p, they charge £1 in my local shop although that is cheaper than the cash machine inside the same shop which charges £1.75.
    :p
  • zaax wrote: »
    Last night I was charged 50p for cashback with a purchase. I thought all card usage charges for the consumer had made illegal.

    I'm sure you were advised prior to receiving the cashback though ;)
  • Terry_Towelling
    Terry_Towelling Posts: 2,279 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 23 August 2018 at 5:11PM
    Are we all just guessing that this practice is probably OK? I'd be inclined to complain to your card company and see what their view is of this. If it turns out to be illegal, they will probably give you a credit. Enforcing the law in this area is down to Trading Standards and I know it's only 50p but sometimes you have to make a stand.

    I can understand the charge for using a 'private' ATM because you are being charged to use the ATM, not for using your card. Being charged for CashBack with a purchase is a bit rich (if on a debit card) because the fee charged to the retailer for a debit card transaction is the same regardless of the transaction amount (whether or not it includes CashBack) and you are doing them a favour by taking 'risky' cash out of their tills and also potentially reducing their cash-handling fees at the bank.

    Complain - I would - but make sure the cost of the phone call to your bank/Trading Standards isn't more than 50p!
  • Are we all just guessing that this practice is probably OK? I'd be inclined to complain to your card company and see what their view is of this. If it turns out to be illegal, they will probably give you a credit. Enforcing the law in this area is down to Trading Standards and I know it's only 50p but sometimes you have to make a stand.

    I can understand the charge for using a 'private' ATM because you are being charged to use the ATM, not for using your card. Being charged for CashBack with a purchase is a bit rich (if on a debit card) because the fee charged to the retailer for a debit card transaction is the same regardless of the transaction amount (whether or not it includes CashBack) and you are doing them a favour by taking 'risky' cash out of their tills and also potentially reducing their cash-handling fees at the bank.

    Complain - I would - but make sure the cost of the phone call to your bank/Trading Standards isn't more than 50p!

    It's not illegal ! Talk about sending someone on a wild goose chase for 50p :rotfl::rotfl:
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 36,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Are we all just guessing that this practice is probably OK?
    I can't speak for others but my starting position was essentially that I can't put my finger on any reason why it wouldn't be OK and therefore there is no basis on which to complain, as the burden of proof surely needs to be on the complainant in this scenario, especially if approaching Trading Standards rather than just moaning to the retailer. If someone can point to some regulations that prohibit this practice, then go ahead!
    Being charged for CashBack with a purchase is a bit rich (if on a debit card) because the fee charged to the retailer for a debit card transaction is the same regardless of the transaction amount (whether or not it includes CashBack)
    I was under the impression that this used to be the case but that the industry was shifting from fixed-fee debit card transactions to percentage-based within merchant agreements? However, either way round, the retailer making more profit doesn't in itself make the charge illegal or even unfair....
  • It's not illegal ! Talk about sending someone on a wild goose chase for 50p :rotfl::rotfl:

    Unbelievable!!:rotfl:




    @Eskbanker, all I could find about the legalities of surcharging was the following:-

    6A.—(1) A payee must not charge a payer any fee in respect of payment by means of
    (a)a payment instrument which
    (i)is a card-based payment instrument as defined in Article 2(20) of Regulation (EU) 2015/751 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29th April 2015 on interchange fees for card-based payment transactions(2); and
    (ii)is not a commercial card as defined in Article 2(6) of that Regulation

    That seems pretty unequivocal to me. The retailer might claim it to be a charge for using the CashBack service rather than any attempt to recover processing costs but the words don't discriminate - a retailer must not charge a fee for a non-business card-based transaction.
  • Zanderman
    Zanderman Posts: 4,848 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    That seems pretty unequivocal to me. The retailer might claim it to be a charge for using the CashBack service rather than any attempt to recover processing costs but the words don't discriminate - a retailer must not charge a fee for a non-business card-based transaction.

    Not quite unequivocal as far as I can see - in that it refers to payments, not to cashback, which may not be classified as a 'payment'
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.